Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3783924
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T11:17:56+00:00 2026-05-19T11:17:56+00:00

I have a clustered index that is over several fields. One of these fields

  • 0

I have a clustered index that is over several fields. One of these fields is CustomerID. I have a cursor that reads from that table, and then updates the CustomerID. The problem is that it cause an infinite loop. I assume that when it changes the customerid field, the clustered index is modified and the table is restructured for the index. This modification seems to invalidate my cursor so the FETCH NEXT FROM Cursor never reaches the end.

    FETCH NEXT FROM AccountSoftwareRegCursor 
INTO @CurrentAccountSoftwareRegUId

    WHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS = 0)
    BEGIN

    UPDATE 
        Licensing.AccountSoftwareRegistration 
    SET 
        AccountUid = @ToAccountUid, 
        CompanyId = @ToCompanyId, 
        UpdatedBy = isnull(@UpdatedBy,'Asset Transfer'),
        UpdatedByAccount = @UpdatedByAccount,
        UpdatedOn = GETUTCDATE()
    WHERE 
        AccountSoftwareRegUid = @CurrentAccountSoftwareRegUId

Is there any command i can issue to stop the table from updating the table for the clustered index until after the cursor finishes?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T11:17:56+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 11:17 am

    If you cannot rewrite this to eliminate the cursor, you’ll want to declare your cursor as STATIC.

    DECLARE AccountSoftwareRegCursor CURSOR STATIC
    FOR
    SELECT...
    

    From the DECLARE CURSOR documentation:

    STATIC

    Defines a cursor that makes a
    temporary copy of the data to be used
    by the cursor. All requests to the
    cursor are answered from this
    temporary table in tempdb; therefore,
    modifications made to base tables are
    not reflected in the data returned by
    fetches made to this cursor, and this
    cursor does not allow modifications.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In a legacy database (SQL Server 2000), we have a clustered index that looks
If I have an SQL Server table with a clustered index on a datetime
Say I have a Person table with 200000 records, there's a clustered index on
i have a table that have one column (AbsoluteUrl NVARCHAR(2048)) and i want to
We have a table with, say, 5 indices (one clustered). Question: will it somehow
So, we have a table, InventoryListItems , that has several columns. Because we're going
i have this table of comments (little over 1 milion rows) that gets around
I have an non-clustered index that has ~1000 pages, 95% fragmentation and a FillFactor
I have a table with two indexes – PK clustered index and non-clustered index.
I have statements like this that are timing out: DELETE FROM [table] WHERE [COL]

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.