Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8930927
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T08:59:58+00:00 2026-06-15T08:59:58+00:00

I have a code that involves building a very large dictionary from pre-calculated data

  • 0

I have a code that involves building a very large dictionary from pre-calculated data (i.e. with many lookups). It uses four-integer tuples as keys and lists of tuples as items. This dictionary is then updated with the appended function for each key (so that each item could be sorted at a later stage). The above process is repeated thousands of times but the original (base) dictionary stays the same. The original dictionary is roughly the same size as the updates (but it varies).

I tried using deepcopy and in order to use the original dictionary as “a base” for updating. The copying turned out to be an order of magnitude slower than rebuilding-the entire dictionary from scratch.

If this is unclear, perhaps this simplified code will make more sense:

print timeit.timeit('''
for iteration in xrange(10):
    base_dictionary = {(month, day, hour): [(value, 'some_data_name' + str(value)) for value in xrange(10)]
                      for month in xrange(5)
                      for day in xrange(5)
                      for hour in xrange(5)
                      }
    for valuenumber in xrange(10):
        for id_set in base_dictionary:
            base_dictionary[id_set].append((valuenumber, 'some_data_name' + str(valuenumber)))
'''
,
'''
''', number=100)

RESULT: 1.30800844321 seconds

print timeit.timeit('''
for iteration in xrange(10):
    new_dictionary = deepcopy(base_dictionary)
    for valuenumber in xrange(10):
        for id_set in new_dictionary:
            new_dictionary[id_set].append((valuenumber, 'some_data_name' + str(valuenumber)))
'''
,
'''
from copy import deepcopy
base_dictionary = {(month, day, hour): [(value, 'some_data_name' + str(value)) for value in xrange(10)]
                  for month in xrange(5)
                  for day in xrange(5)
                  for hour in xrange(5)
                  }
''', number=100)

RESULT: 13.8005886255 seconds

It feels very wasteful to rebuild the same dictionary every time I run an iteration. Is there a way to accelerate this process?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T08:59:58+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 8:59 am

    You need something between shallow copy and deep copy. The tuples don’t need to be copied because they are immutable.

    newdict = {k, v[:] for k, v in olddict.iteritems()}
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a code base that deals with simulation of certain data. It involves
I have code that reloads images via HTTP from the main thread and displays
I have code that uses Win API function RegSaveKeyEx to save registry entries to
I have code that uses jquery.slideup and jquery.slidedown How can i know that div
I have been given a code that also involves an asynchronous socketing which I
Suppose you have some source code that comes from the unix world. This source
I am building a Java applet that involves downloading images among other resources from
I have some code that uses the Swing/AWT printing functionality that I want to
I have code that generates a List<string[]> variable but can't quite figure out how
I have code that looks more or less like the code below but it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.