Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 496095
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T05:39:13+00:00 2026-05-13T05:39:13+00:00

I have a complex MySQL query that joins three tables and self-joins one table

  • 0

I have a complex MySQL query that joins three tables and self-joins one table to itself.

There is a Master and a Slave that have identical data and indices. The Master is a powerful box compared to the Slave, yet the query runs 10x faster on the Slave (during a period of light load for the Master).

The execution plans are vastly different.

Master execution plan
1, 'SIMPLE', 'table3_', 'const', 'PRIMARY', 'PRIMARY', '12', 'const', 1, 100.00, 'Using temporary; Using filesort'
1, 'SIMPLE', 'table2_', 'ref', 'PRIMARY,FK376E02E910238FCA', 'FK376E02E910238FCA', '13', 'const', 105, 100.00, 'Using where'
1, 'SIMPLE', 'table0_', 'ref', 'FK57012F937DD0DC02,FK57012F9398CD28D0', 'FK57012F9398CD28D0', '13', 'table2_.ID', 1515, 100.00, 'Using where'
1, 'SIMPLE', 'table1_', 'eq_ref', 'PRIMARY,FKE7E81F1ED170D4C9', 'PRIMARY', '8', 'table0_.FK_ID', 1, 100.00, 'Using where'

Slave execution plan
1, 'SIMPLE', 'table3_', 'const', 'PRIMARY', 'PRIMARY', '12', 'const', 1, 100.00, 'Using filesort'
1, 'SIMPLE', 'table1_', 'ref', 'PRIMARY,FKE7E81F1ED170D4C9', 'FKE7E81F1ED170D4C9', '9', 'const', 187398, 100.00, 'Using where'
1, 'SIMPLE', 'table0_', 'ref', 'FK57012F937DD0DC02,FK57012F9398CD28D0', 'FK57012F937DD0DC02', '9', 'table1_.ID', 1, 100.00, 'Using where'
1, 'SIMPLE', 'table2_', 'eq_ref', 'PRIMARY,FK376E02E910238FCA', 'PRIMARY', '12', 'table0_.FK_ID', 1, 100.00, 'Using where'

The tables are processed in different orders and the master DB uses both a temporary table and a filesort, while the slave uses only a filesort.

What factors could cause the differing plans with such vastly different execution times?

UPDATE:

Is it possible this has to do with index statistics? I plan to run an ANALYZE TABLE on the Master during a low-volume period. SHOW INDEX shows very different cardinality for some of the keys between Master and Slave.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T05:39:14+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 5:39 am

    MySQL optimizes queries based upon collected statistics.

    Looking at your output you see that they are using different keys, you might have to add key hints or even force keys

    FROM table2_ JOIN

    should become

    FROM table2_ USE KEY(‘FK376E02E910238FCA’) JOIN

    Or FORCE KEY

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this rather complex query that grabs data from three tables, and now
I've got a pretty complex query in MySQL that slows down drastically when one
I have a very large and complex MySQL query that gets run from a
I have three tables in MySQL that are related, yet not technically linked to
I have a very complex MySQL query that includes use of the same subquery
I have quite a large and complex table in a MySQL database that would
I have an sql query that counts the number of results for a complex
I have a complex query and it was working fine before adding one more
I have a MySQL table containing phone numbers that may be formatted in many
I have a little bit complex MySQL query for me and i can't figure

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.