Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 303561
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T07:11:59+00:00 2026-05-12T07:11:59+00:00

I have a constructor that takes some arguments. I had assumed that they were

  • 0

I have a constructor that takes some arguments. I had assumed that they were initialized in the order listed, but in one case, it appears they were being initialized in reverse, resulting in an abort. When I reversed the arguments, the program stopped aborting.

Below is an example of the syntax I’m using. a_ needs to be initialized before b_ in this case. Can you ensure this order of initialization?

class A
{
  public:
    OtherClass a_;
    AnotherClass b_;

    A(OtherClass o, string x, int y)
      : a_(o)
      , b_(a_, x, y) {}
};
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T07:11:59+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 7:11 am

    It depends on the order of data member declarations in the class. So a_ will be the first one, then b_ will be the second one in your example.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class with two constructors, one that takes no arguments and one
If I have a constructor that takes a number of arguments: var Mammal =
So I have a base class with a constructor that takes (T V) .
I'm working on someone's code and they have a constructor that uses: class qwerty
I know that you can't have a constructor in an interface, but here is
Suppose I have a method that takes an object of some kind as an
Here's the situation: I have an abstract class with a constructor that takes a
I have a class that takes many arguments to create. It’s a sort of
I have a constructor that has a series of classes and functions within it
I have a constructor that looks like this (in c++): Interpreter::Interpreter() { tempDat ==

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.