Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 220353
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:55:50+00:00 2026-05-11T18:55:50+00:00

I have a convenience collection class in my Flex project called HashMap, which is

  • 0

I have a convenience collection class in my Flex project called HashMap, which is essentially a wrapper around the flash.utils.Dictionary with a bunch of convenience methods and an added (synced) ArrayCollection so that I can pass the HashMap to bindable controls that want an ArrayCollection. That all works fine.

What doesn’t work fine, I’m finding out just now, is putting that HashMap in a local SharedObject.

Registering the class causes it to be stored and come back as the proper type, and the ArrayCollection member comes back just fine, but the Dictionary doesn’t store its data..

Here’s a snippet:

[RemoteClass(alias="com.tamedtornado.collections.HashMap")]
public class HashMap extends Proxy
{
    public var hash:Dictionary = new Dictionary();

    // Keeps an array collection as well so we can give this to a data bound control

    [Bindable]
    public var collection:ArrayCollection = new ArrayCollection();

So that’s the relevant stuff. What’s the procedure for getting that Dictionary to store itself correctly? I actually have to make the ArrayCollection transient, as right now every time the SO is flushed, I’m getting another copy of the (uniquely keyed in the Dictionary) data.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:55:51+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:55 pm

    I tinkered with this some more, and got lots of goofy results trying to let the serialization “just work”, so I finally just implemented the IExternalizable interface, and that fixed it.

        public function readExternal(input:IDataInput):void
        {
            var hashCount:int = input.readInt();
    
            for (var i:int = 0;i<hashCount;i++)
            {
                var prop:Object = input.readObject();
                var val:Object = input.readObject();
    
                putEntry(prop,val);
            }
        }
    
        public function writeExternal(output:IDataOutput):void
        {
            output.writeInt(collection.length);
    
            for (var prop:Object in hash)
            {
                output.writeObject(prop);
    
                output.writeObject(hash[prop]);
            }
        }
    

    Everything gets stored and comes across properly typed. The objects stored have to either be native classes (like String), or have a [RemoteClass] metadata tag/registerClassAlias() call. But other than that, it works.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a userControl11 (either in winform or wpf) which has a ValueChanged custom
Given a String, I know Groovy provides convenience methods like String.findAll(String, Closure) Finds all
I have a large codebase (written by me) that uses the Stack data structure.
After a lot of searching, I have not found any solution for the following
I am running Ruby on Rails 3 and I have an application that makes
I am in a classic design dilemma. I am writing a C# data structure
I've been using HashMaps since I started programming again in Java without really understanding
In Core java 1 I've read CAUTION: An ArrayList is far less efficient than
One of the most convenient things about RJS is its ability to render a
In Google App Engine, there is such a thing as a ListProperty that allows

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.