Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7847607
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T17:57:31+00:00 2026-06-02T17:57:31+00:00

I have a custom class that looks like this: qx.Class.define(‘test.Table2’, { extend: qx.ui.table.Table, construct:

  • 0

I have a custom class that looks like this:

qx.Class.define('test.Table2', {
extend: qx.ui.table.Table,

construct: function(model){
    this.base(arguments);
    }
});

What happens?

If I use the qx.ui.table.Table with a model it shows data. If I change to test.Table2 then it shows an empty table with empty col names too. only a little bar.

How do I extend it properly?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T17:57:33+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 5:57 pm

    You should pass all parameters to base class constructor:

    this.base(arguments, model);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a custom class that uses boost mutexes and locks like this (only
I currently have a .NET custom configurationsection that looks like this: <customSection name=My section
Lets say I have a custom data type that looks something like this: public
I have a custom class that I use to build table strings. I would
I have a java class that looks like public class MyClass { private final
I have a model that looks like this and stores data as key-value pairs.
I have a custom class that has as an instance variable of a coordinate:
I have a custom ButtonUI class that paints the button. Before drawing the text,
I have a custom iterator template class that wraps up a std::list iterator. In
I have created a custom collection class that I am trying to bind to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.