Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 914363
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T17:42:23+00:00 2026-05-15T17:42:23+00:00

I have a custom logging system which allows me to send information to a

  • 0

I have a custom logging system which allows me to send information to a log file and the console depending on the verbosity currently selected. Right now, the trouble I am having is with the output to the file, with output to the console working fine.

Here is an example:

     ilra_talk << "Local IP: " << systemIP() << " |  Hostname: " << systemhostname() << endl;
     // the systemIP() and systemhostname() functions have already been defined

This should result in the current local IP and hostname of the system being printed to a file. However, it is only resulting in the information being printed to the console, despite how the function is overloaded to result in it printing to both.

I’ve outlined the code below. Any assistance is appreciated (as always).

A definition currently exists for ilra_talk which results in a new class object being created:

#define ilra_talk ilra(__FUNCTION__,0)

The class definition the following:

class ilra
{
    static int ilralevel_set; // properly initialized in my main .cpp
    static int ilralevel_passed; // properly initialized in my main .cpp
    static bool relay_enabled; // properly initialized in my main .cpp
    static bool log_enabled; // properly initialized in my main .cpp
    static ofstream logfile; // properly initialized in my main .cpp
public:
    // constructor / destructor
    ilra(const std::string &funcName, int toset)
    {
        ilralevel_passed = toset;
    }
    ~ilra(){};

    // enable / disable irla functions
    static void ilra_verbose_level(int toset){
        ilralevel_set = toset;
    }
    static void ilra_log_enabled(bool toset){
        log_enabled = toset;

        if (log_enabled == true){
            // get current time
            time_t rawtime;
            time ( &rawtime );

            // name of log file (based on time of application start)
            stringstream logname_s;
            string logname = "rclient-";
            logname_s << rawtime;
            logname.append(logname_s.str());

            // open a log file
            logfile.open(logname.c_str());
        }
    }

    // output
    template <class T>
    ilra &operator<<(const T &v)
    {
        if(log_enabled == true){ // log_enabled is set to true
            logfile << v; 
            logfile << "Test" << endl;  // test will show up, but intended information will not appear
            }
        if(ilralevel_passed <= ilralevel_set)
            std::cout << v;
        return *this;
    }

    ilra &operator<<(std::ostream&(*f)(std::ostream&))
    {
        if(log_enabled == true) // log_enabled is set to true
            logfile << *f;
        if(ilralevel_passed <= ilralevel_set)
            std::cout << *f;
        return *this;
    }
};  // end of the class
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T17:42:24+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 5:42 pm

    I see nothing totally wrong with the code, though I personally would have made two changes:

    1. Put the logfile.flush() into the ilra::~ilra(). Logging and buffering are no friends.

    2. Change static ofstream logfile to static ofstream *logfile: allocated/delete it in ilra_log_enabled() and add NULL check in the << operators. I prefer objects with explicit life cycle.

    Overall, since logging is a performance hog, I never use the iostreams for it and stick with the printf()-like macros: logging check is made without a function call, right in the macro. That has important side-effect: if no logging is needed then the parameter list isn’t evaluated at all. In your case it is impossible to avoid the functions being called, e.g. systemIP() and systemhostname(), since the check for log level/etc is done after they are already have been called. With the macros I can also for example remove completely debug-level logging from release builds (or corollary: in a debug build I can have as much logging as I want).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have custom components which must adjust their text content based on space constraints.
I have custom coded several enterprise applications for mid to large organizations to use
I have custom errors configured in my web.config, but IIS 6.0 is returning the
Can you have custom client-side javascript Validation for standard ASP.NET Web Form Validators? For
I have a few models that need to have custom find conditions placed on
hi i would like to create a custom calendar, this calendar will have custom
I have a custom validation function in JavaScript in a user control on a
I have a custom built ajax [div] based dynamic dropdown. I have an [input]
I have a custom control that implements IPostBackEventHandler. Some client-side events invoke __doPostBack(controlID, eventArgs).
I have a custom installer action that updates the PATH environment, and creates an

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.