Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 259815
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T22:17:44+00:00 2026-05-11T22:17:44+00:00

I have a data structure which uses composite ids (Which I dont wish to

  • 0

I have a data structure which uses composite ids (Which I dont wish to change to single)
Everything loads fine except for many-to-one joins which if the join is empty, instead of mapping the property to null, maps it to an empty proxy object. I have written an ugly work around( see bleow). Any solutions to this?

private Node _Parent;

    public Node Parent
    {
        get
        {
            return this._Parent;
        }
        set
        {
            this._Parent = Proxy.Check<Node>(value);
        }
    }
internal static class Proxy
{
    public static T Check<T>(T obj) where T : PersistentObject
    {
        if (obj is NHibernate.Proxy.INHibernateProxy && obj != null)
        {
            try 
            {
                int id = obj.ID;
                return obj;             
            }
            catch //Proxy only object cant retrieve ID
            {
                return null;
            }
        }
        else
        {
            return obj;
        }
    }

}

with the mapping file beginning

<class name="Node" table="Node">
    <composite-id>
        <key-property name="ID"/>
        <key-property name="VersionID"/>
    </composite-id>

and accessed by

    <many-to-one name="Node" class="Node" >
        <column name="NodeID"/>
        <column name="VersionID" />
    </many-to-one>
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T22:17:45+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:17 pm

    Not exactly sure if this is the perfect fix for this situation, but this fixed the issue for me when I encountered the same problem while working on an old DB with composite keys.

    By setting not-found to ignore on your links, NHibernate will treat empty objects as null instead of exceptions. When using this technique NHibernate will execute a seperate query so there may be small performance hits, as this is basically eager loading the object.

    You could try just eager loading the object instead of using this technique, but I have a feeling it would return an exception as it would be expecting an object (not null). I would suggest posting a question in the NHibernate forums if this doesn’t work as I am definately not an expert in this area, but this may be a smaller/less ugly work around for you.

    For example:

    <many-to-one name="Node" class="Node" not-found="ignore">
        <column name="NodeID"/>
        <column name="VersionID" />
    </many-to-one>
    

    Hope this helps,

    Jay

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose i have a software program which uses an inefficient data structure. Now how
i have an application which uses CoreData/.sqlite to store my data, a tab bar
I have a simple data structure which is serialized and deserialized. Upon deserialization, I
I have a data structure that represents C# code like this: class Namespace: string
I have the following data structure (a list of lists) [ ['4', '21', '1',
I have a tree data structure that is L levels deep each node has
Assuming Visual C/C++ 6, I have a complex data structure of 22399 elements that
I have to write a component that re-creates SQL Server tables (structure and data)
Let's say we have a solution with the following structure: Project.DAL - Data access
I have an app which uses SQL Express and my customers are mainly people

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.