Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 247533
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T21:16:02+00:00 2026-05-11T21:16:02+00:00

I have a database that the client needs to update. They like to use

  • 0

I have a database that the client needs to update. They like to use access. Some tables randomly become read-only for them. Any ideas why?

They are using Access 2007 and MS SQL 2005.

SQL Table:

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Users](
    [SyncGroup] [varchar](20) NULL,
    [UserID] [varchar](20) NOT NULL,
    [Password] [varchar](20)  NOT NULL,
    [Restriction] [text] NULL DEFAULT (' '),
    [SiteCode] [varchar](20) NULL,
    [Group] [varchar](20)  NULL,
    [EmpId] [varchar](20)  NULL,
    [TimeZoneOffset] [int] NULL,
    [UseDaylightSavings] [bit] NULL,
    PRIMARY KEY ([UserID]) )
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T21:16:02+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:16 pm

    Access really likes having a TimeStamp aka RowVersion field on every table. I don’t know if this will fix your problem though.

    “On servers that support them (such as Microsoft SQL Server), timestamp fields make updating records more efficient. Timestamp fields are maintained by the server and are updated every time the record is updated. If you have a timestamp field, Microsoft Access needs to check only the unique index and the timestamp field to see whether the record has changed since it was last retrieved from the server. Otherwise, Microsoft Access must check all the fields in the record. If you add a timestamp field to an attached table, re-attach the table in order to inform Microsoft Access of the new field.”

    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc917601.aspx

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 117k
  • Answers 118k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Timer timer… May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use GROUP_CONCAT SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(bar) FROM TABLE GROUP BY foo; May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your code doesn't work because the function is not returning… May 11, 2026 at 10:50 pm

Related Questions

For various reasons, we are writing a new business objects/data storage library. One of
I am just starting porting an application to ASP.net MVC and I have an
This'll be my first question on this platform. I've done lots of development using
I new to Scrum and while I understand the team concept behind the Sprints,

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.