Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 570335
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:23:25+00:00 2026-05-13T13:23:25+00:00

I have a debian/control file which includes: Build-Depends: … libboost1.35-dev, libboost-date-time1.35-dev, … This stops

  • 0

I have a debian/control file which includes:

Build-Depends: ... libboost1.35-dev, libboost-date-time1.35-dev, ...

This stops the package from building on modern Ubuntu systems.

I could just change all the 1.35s for 1.38s and then it would work on modern Ubuntu, but not older versions.

I would like to do something like:

Build-Depends: ... libboost-dev (>=1.35), libboost-date-time-dev (>=1.35), ...

but it seems that the 1.35 is hardcoded into the package names. i.e. libbost1.35-dev is a different package from libboost1.38m not just a different version of the same package.

Is my understanding correct here? I can understand hardcoding major version numbers into the package name (if the new version’s ABI breaks backward compatibility).

Is there a way to write a Debian control file which allows a package to be depend on having a particular version of libboost or higher?

Thanks,

Chris.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:23:26+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:23 pm

    You should “Depends: libboost-dev” unless there is a special reason to target for specific versions of Boost. This libboost-dev package is a pseudo-package that pulls in the suitable version of libboost.

    If you really want to target them specifically, use the “or” operator:

    Depends: A | B | C 
    

    See: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 354k
  • Answers 354k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You should consider building unit tests using tools such as… May 14, 2026 at 8:30 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If by "neighboring", you meant the previous and next elements… May 14, 2026 at 8:30 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer disable CamelHumps in Resharper -> Options -> Editor -> Use… May 14, 2026 at 8:30 am

Related Questions

I have in the past successfully managed to copy/edit/paste rewrite rules on an apache
I have decided to go with Subversion for a source control repository for my
I'm trying to improve performance under high load and would like to implement opcode
I just got a shiny, brand-new Debian server handed to me by our Systems
Hi i have a debian server. Today my site was showing Error establishing a

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.