Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6642775
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T23:58:13+00:00 2026-05-25T23:58:13+00:00

I have a document with only about 200 elements in it. But I am

  • 0

I have a document with only about 200 elements in it. But I am still getting a very slow response just by querying it like:

Product.order_by([:name, :asc]).limit(20)

I do have an index on name which I have verified exists in the mongo shell. Is the only way to return efficiently sorted results to change they _id value to something like

"#{name}_#{random_id}"
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T23:58:14+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 11:58 pm

    Short answer: absolutely not.
    Long answer: let’s make sure the query is using your index (not just that the index exists).

    Our query:

    This does not use an index (in this case, because it does not exist)

    db.products.find().sort( { name: -1}).explain()
    {
        "cursor" : "BasicCursor",
        "nscanned" : 1042,
        "nscannedObjects" : 1042,
        "n" : 1042,
        "scanAndOrder" : true,
        "millis" : 5,
        "nYields" : 0,
        "nChunkSkips" : 0,
        "isMultiKey" : false,
        "indexOnly" : false,
        "indexBounds" : {
            }
    

    Let’s prove it

    db.products.getIndexes()
    [
        {
            "name" : "_id_",
            "ns" : "project_development.products",
            "key" : {
                "_id" : 1
            }
        }
    ]
    

    Create the index

    db.products.ensureIndex({name:1});
    

    Now when we explain the query:

    db.products.find().sort( { name: -1}).explain()
    {
        "cursor" : "BtreeCursor name reverse",
        "nscanned" : 1042,
        "nscannedObjects" : 1042,
        "n" : 1042,
        "millis" : 2,
        "nYields" : 0,
        "nChunkSkips" : 0,
        "isMultiKey" : false,
        "indexOnly" : false,
        "indexBounds" : {
            "name" : [
                [
                    {
                        "$maxElement" : 1
                    },
                    {
                        "$minElement" : 1
                    }
                ]
            ]
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I read a few documents about Mutex and still the only Idea I have
I have an XML document with un-namespaced elements, and I want to use XSLT
I have some XML that looks something like this: <Root> <Documents> <Document id=1/> </Documents>
A have the document with 23 figures and 46 tables (appendix to journal article).
I have a document and want to create it as a twocolumn-document. That works
I have a document with headings and unordered lists. How can I use JQuery
I have a document with connection information to a device over a serial port.
Scenario: I have a document I created using LaTeX (my resume in this case),
As everyone knows, sometimes developers have to document stuff. Or capture some stuff for
I have an versioned document store which I want to access through an dict

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.