Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8539739
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T11:26:17+00:00 2026-06-11T11:26:17+00:00

I have a domain object Foo that has an 1:n relation to a domain

  • 0

I have a domain object Foo that has an 1:n relation to a domain object Bar.

There are two major use cases where I need to get all foo’s matching some criterion. In case A, I care about the bars attached to each foo, in case B, I don’t. There are quite a lot of bars, so simply always loading the bars is not good for performance of case A. Similarly, not loading the bars eagerly will lead to an n+1 avalanche in case B. So neither tagging the realtion as @Lazy nor not tagging it is the correct choice.

Now, my question: Is it possible to tell the extbase persistence layer at query time whether to be lazy or eager? If yes, how? If no, is there another way in Extbase to avoid the n+1 problem (i.e. load all necessary bars and then hope that caching works when iterating through the foos)?

My last resort, of course, would be to load the foos with lazy loading, load the bars manually in a second query, and then manually set the relation.

Any suggestions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T11:26:19+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 11:26 am

    I’ve been playing around with Extbase and delving into the internals in the last few months, and the upshot is this: It’ impossible.

    I suppose that closes this question, though not the way I’ld like.

    Actually, even worse: Eager loading is not implemented at all, the @eager tag which according to the documentation sets eager loading for a relation is ignored.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a domain object that has a couple of Uri properties that need
I have a domain object that has been auto generated for me by MyGeneration.
I have a an object stored in the model called domain, which has two
Just assume I have some class Foo, that has two dependencies: an ISerializer<T> and
I have a domain object that has a Map: private Map<AutoHandlingSlotKey, LinkedHashSet<AutoFunction>> autoHandling; When
I have a domain object that has an attribute which is a collection containing
have a Grails domain object that has a custom static function to grab data
Assume I have this domain object... public class SpansMultipleTables { public int CommonID {get;
When you have a domain object that needs to display as an interface control,
I have a Map, that I want to persist. The domain object is something

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.