Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6208749
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T05:51:40+00:00 2026-05-24T05:51:40+00:00

I have a fact and a goal like below: disconnected. join :- disconnected, time(T),

  • 0

I have a fact and a goal like below:

disconnected.

join :- disconnected, time(T), send(T).

Once this goal executes it should make disconnected false and thus not execute again. I am new to Prolog so I am a bit stuck. I am sure it’s something really simple but can’t figure it out at the moment. Any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T05:51:41+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 5:51 am

    You might use assert or retract to change the known facts. Or you might use global variables. I am not sure how standard that is.

    The easiest would be to declare your join with two parameters: input parameter that signifies the current state, and an output parameter signifying the new state.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider a grocery store scenario (I'm making this up) where you have FACT records
As a matter of fact you have smth like /java/src and /java/test . But
I have to preface this with the fact that I love jQuery as a
I have, let's say, this simple class: public class User { [Required(AllowEmptyStrings = false,
I have some code here. I recently added this root_id parameter. The goal of
Can a fact table have no keys at all? or if it can, is
I have basically succumbed to the fact that if you are a hardcore computer
I have a table (table variable in-fact) that holds several thousand (50k approx) rows
I have some concerns related to the fact of testing some functions containing the
Have you ever added unit tests, after the fact, to legacy code? How complicated

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.