Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7848869
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T18:21:25+00:00 2026-06-02T18:21:25+00:00

I have a fairly large script that contains about 60 global variables. I’m thinking

  • 0

I have a fairly large script that contains about 60 global variables. I’m thinking about using the namespace pattern to encapsulate my script and have only one global variable that references one object.

Even though this pattern is considered best practice, I’m also thinking about an alternative: storing the global variables inside the DOM, in hidden divs, and accessing them with $('#MyGlobalVar1').text(). Is this a good idea or not?

Thanks for your suggestions.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T18:21:29+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 6:21 pm

    No, this is not a good idea.

    It pollutes the DOM with non-semantic data, and is less efficient as well. That’s even worse than polluting the global JS namespace, and worse still, it only allows you to store strings.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a fairly large codebase that depends on MooTools v1.11 and am about
I have a fairly large PHP codebase (10k files) that I work with using
I have a fairly large script and am trying to find out, why $(document).on(
We have fairly large C++ application which is composed of about 60 projects in
I have a fairly large webapp that I run on a Media Temple server.
We have several fairly large JavaScript files embedded into a single script resources DLL.
I have a fairly large Indesign file with a text field that needs to
I have a fairly large EF4 model, using POCO code gen. I've got lots
I have a fairly large xml file ( greater than 2mb ) that I'm
I have a fairly large repetitive XML to create using JAXB. Storing the whole

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.