Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7772557
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T16:54:59+00:00 2026-06-01T16:54:59+00:00

I have a fairly simple one-to-many type join in a MySQL query. In this

  • 0

I have a fairly simple one-to-many type join in a MySQL query. In this case, I’d like to LIMIT my results by the left table.

For example, let’s say I have an accounts table and a comments table, and I’d like to pull 100 rows from accounts and all the associated comments rows for each.

Thy only way I can think to do this is with a sub-select in in the FROM clause instead of simply selecting FROM accounts. Here is my current idea:

SELECT a.*, c.* FROM 
    (SELECT * FROM accounts LIMIT 100) a
    LEFT JOIN `comments` c on c.account_id = a.id
    ORDER BY a.id

However, whenever I need to do a sub-select of some sort, my intermediate level SQL knowledge feels like it’s doing something wrong.

Is there a more efficient, or faster, way to do this, or is this pretty good?

By the way…

This might be the absolute simplest way to do this, which I’m okay with as an answer. I’m simply trying to figure out if there IS another way to do this that could potentially compete with the above statement in terms of speed.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T16:55:00+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 4:55 pm

    Looks perfect to me.

    Just wondering if it is ok with you to receive less or more than 100 rows from the above query.
    Because if for a particular row of accounts table there are no rows in comments table then you would get less than 100 rows. Similarly if there are multiple matching rows in comments table for a row in accounts table then you may get more than 100 rows.

    See: How can I optimize this query, takes more than a min to execute

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a fairly simple Many to One relationship between two classes: @Entity public
I have a fairly simple question: how to take one row of cv::Mat and
I have a fairly simple Linq query (simplified code): dim x = From Product
I have a fairly simple system, and for the purposes of this question there
I have a fairly simple iPhone app that downloads a set of UITableView results
I have a fairly simple ASP.NET 2.0 menu control using a sitemap file and
I have a fairly simple const struct in some C code that simply holds
I have a fairly simple addition to the HTTP standard. An ambitious goal I
I have a fairly simple sync problem. I have a table with about 10
I have a fairly simple block of code. Sub Run(Name) on error resume next

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.