Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 372355
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T14:12:10+00:00 2026-05-12T14:12:10+00:00

I have a few classes (about 15 or so) in VB.net (2005) that I

  • 0

I have a few classes (about 15 or so) in VB.net (2005) that I would like to be able to serialize to xml. Unfortunately they are labeled as friend classes and cannot be exposed outside of the assembly.

The assembly is a dll that is a com interop plugin to a CAD system. I have set all of my classes as friends so that they are not exposed outside of the assembly for 3rd party use. I am wondering if I even need to do that. Setting the class to public would allow me to serialize things. However I don’t want people linking to the assembly and using the classes.

Should I even worry about other programs linking to my assembly? In fact I don’t think there is a large chance of this happening. I just don’t like the idea of having almost all of my classes with a public scope.

Is there a way to make a friend class serializable? Or should I just make things public?

Cheers,
Troy

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T14:12:10+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 2:12 pm

    This “protection” won’t work anyway. People can load your assembly with reflection and then use the classes. So that reason to not make the classes public vanishes, which simplifies things.

    If you really want to keep your classes internal, you can still either write your own serialization code (completely manually (efficient, but much work required) or with reflection), or you can provide separate data-only classes for serialization purposes only, which can be made public. Then you just have to write code that imports/exports the data in your internal classes to the serialization classes, and the classes won’t be of much use to other developers since the actual code is in the internal classes.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a few classes that perform background tasks that might raise exceptions. They
I have a few classes that are instantiated using ninject Session Scoping - because
I have a few classes which have a property which is unique to that
I have a few classes in a project that I inherited that are really
I have a data access library that has a few classes that all implement
I have a few classes that hold references to other classes through IDictionary instance
I was thinking it would be cool to have a few classes to wrap
I have an interface, IFindable that is implemented by a few classes. One other
I've gotten to the point where I have made a few classes that I
I'm currently attempting to unmarshal some existing XML into a few classes I have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.