Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1034577
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T14:24:51+00:00 2026-05-16T14:24:51+00:00

I have a fields_for tag, where I specify the prefix (lets say for some

  • 0

I have a fields_for tag, where I specify the prefix (lets say for some good reasons), and this is supposed to represent a one-to-one relationship.

I am trying to represent a relationship

widget has_many thingamagigs
thingamagig has_one whatchamacallit

The field_for code is:

fields_for "widgt[thingamagigs_attributes][][whatchamacallit_attributes]", thingamagig.whatchamacallit do |x|

which generates names (wrongly):

widget[thingamagigs_attributes][][whatchamacallit_attributes][][value]

The better solution would be

t.fields_for :whatchamacallit do |x|

where t = fields_for the thingamagig… However if I do that, the following names are generated

widgt[thingamagigs_attributes][whatchamacallit_attributes][]

which is completely wrong as all other fields for a thingamagig is…

widgt[thingamagigs_attributes][][name]

So in all cases I am screwed. The original field_for using a string cannot be used with accepts_nested_attributes_for :whatchamacallit since whatchamacallit is a singular relationship and an object is expected not an array. The second fields_for will simply not work because rails cannot parse the params object correctly. Is there a way to tell the first forms_for to not add the [] after [whatchamacallit_attributes] in all field names?

My current solution is to augment the model with

def whatchamacallit_attributes=(whatchamacallit_attributes)
  assign_nested_attributes_for_one_to_one_association(:whatchamacallit, whatchamacallit_attributes[0])
end

Which will work even with the broken form fields. However this feels extremely hacky, does anyone have a solution?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T14:24:52+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:24 pm
    def whatchamacallit_attributes=(whatchamacallit_attributes)
      assign_nested_attributes_for_one_to_one_association(:whatchamacallit, whatchamacallit_attributes[0])
    end
    

    Looks like I have to stick with this solution since nothing else was offered.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a web report that uses a Django form (new forms) for fields
SPListItem.GetFormattedValue seems to have a strange behavior for DateTime fields. It retrieves the DateTime
I have a coworker who writes unit tests for objects which fill their fields
It's common to have a table where for example the the fields are account,
I have the following as the value for my textbox in SSRS report: =iif(IsNothing(Fields!MyDate.Value),
I have a form that has multiple fields, and for testing purposes is there
Do you have pseudocode for field validation of the following items in the UK?
I have two lists of custom objects and want to update a field for
I have a text field (flash.display.textField) for editing, but the default font does not
I have an access database with many tables. I am looking for a field

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.