Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 874389
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T11:05:49+00:00 2026-05-15T11:05:49+00:00

I have a file with unit tests testOne() {…} testTwo() {…} … but when

  • 0

I have a file with unit tests

    testOne() {...}
    testTwo() {...}
...

but when I am troubleshooting I would like to turn off all except the unit test
that is causing problems (due to massive amount of logging). At the moment I have done like this:

#if 0
testOne() {...}
#endif
..
#if 1
testTroublesome() {...}
#endif

But I was wondering if there is some better more convenient way to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T11:05:50+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:05 am

    You could for example have an environment variable to signify which test to run, with unset meaning run them all (which would be the usual case). Like so: (this is C, but I think it’ll work in objetive C as well)

    char *env = getenv ("MY_TEST_ENV");
    

    and then when running each test

    if (! env || 0 == strcmp (env, "testOne"))
      testOne();
    

    Or you could put the same condition inside the test itself and just return if it fails. This wouldn’t keep your tests from being compiled though, but I don’t think that’s your problem is it? Just set the environment variable to the test you want to run, and none of the others will.

    EDIT
    To make it even easier, put that in a macro

    #define RUN_TEST(fn) do{if(!getenv("MY_TEST_ENV")||!strcmp(getenv("MY_TEST_ENV"),#x))x();}while(0)
    

    and always execute your test with that

    RUN_TEST(test_one);
    

    … and you’ve got yourself a little unit test framework going. Before taking it too far and reinventing too many wheels though, you should (as has been pointed out) perhaps take a look at existing frameworks.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 444k
  • Answers 444k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I figured it out today with a little help from… May 15, 2026 at 6:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you're talking about 0x00C0 being the time division field,… May 15, 2026 at 6:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Instead of SQL Server enterprise edition you can give Express… May 15, 2026 at 6:41 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.