Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6888341
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T06:00:08+00:00 2026-05-27T06:00:08+00:00

I have a following scenario, void* Refresh(void *) { usleep(10); .. } static void

  • 0

I have a following scenario,

void* Refresh(void *)
{
 usleep(10);
 ..
}

static void RefreshViews()
{    ...
     pthread_t t;
     pthread_create( &t, NULL, &Refresh, NULL);
     ...
}

I want to run a thread at the end of RefreshViews() function. For it to work(temp solution) properly, I have added sleep in another thread at the beginning of its execution in Refresh() function.

How can I handle this situation better?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T06:00:09+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:00 am

    There are three methods you can use:

    1. Like I said in my comment, start the thread just before you leave the function.

      static void RefreshViews()
      {
          /* The code... */
      
          pthread_t t;
          pthread_create( &t, NULL, &Refresh, NULL);
      }
      
    2. Create the thread in the function calling RefreshViews.

    3. Have an extra function, that acts as a proxy to the real function, and which creates the thread:

      static void RefreshViews()
      {
          RealRefreshViews();
          pthread_t t;
          pthread_create( &t, NULL, &Refresh, NULL);
      }
      

    One thing about the first method, is that you have to remember to create the thread if you have an explicit return before the end of the function. Or use goto to go to the thread creation instead of return.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following scenario, class foo { ... private: char *_test; }; void
I have the following scenario where I want to pass in string and a
I have the following scenario jQuery('#content').fadeOut('slow',function(){ jQuery('#content').load(detail.php?product=+imgID+&category=+cat); jQuery('#content').fadeIn('fast'); }); My problem however is that
Consider the following scenario. We have a C++ function with a static local variable:
I have the following scenario I have a main form as MDI parent and
I have a following scenario – and what I am really looking is real
I have the following scenario: Entities are loaded from the database. One of them
I have the following scenario. I have created an ASP.NET web application (framework 3.5)
I have the following scenario. The client code only has access to FooHandler, not
I have the following scenario: - 64bit Windows Server 2008. - 32bit .NET application

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.