Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1011605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T09:15:33+00:00 2026-05-16T09:15:33+00:00

I have a function, ranker , that takes a vector and assigns numerical ranks

  • 0

I have a function, ranker, that takes a vector and assigns numerical ranks to it in ascending order. For example,
ranker([5 1 3 600]) = [3 1 2 4] or
ranker([42 300 42 42 1 42] = [3.5 6 3.5 3.5 1 3.5] .

I am using a matrix, variable_data and I want to apply the ranker function to each row for all rows in variable data. This is my current solution, but I feel there is a way to vectorize it and have it as equally fast :p

variable_ranks = nan(size(variable_data));
for i=1:1:numel(nmac_ids)
    variable_ranks(i,:) = ranker(abs(variable_data(i,:)));
end
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T09:15:34+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 9:15 am

    With collaboration from Amro and Jonas

    variable_ranks = tiedrank(variable_data')';
    

    Ranker has been replaced by the Matlab function in the Stat toolbox (sorry for those who don’t have it),

    [R,TIEADJ] = tiedrank(X) computes the
    ranks of the values in the vector X.
    If any X values are tied, tiedrank
    computes their average rank. The
    return value TIEADJ is an adjustment
    for ties required by the nonparametric
    tests signrank and ranksum, and for
    the computation of Spearman’s rank
    correlation.

    TIEDRANK will compute along columns in Matlab 7.9.0 (R2009b), however it is undocumented. So by transposing the input matrix, rows turn into columns and will rank them. The second transpose is then used to organize the data in the same manner as the input. There in essence is a very classy hack :p

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.