Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8965363
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T16:47:12+00:00 2026-06-15T16:47:12+00:00

I have a function seperateFuncs such that seperateFuncs :: [a -> b] -> (a

  • 0

I have a function seperateFuncs such that

seperateFuncs :: [a -> b] -> (a -> [b])
seperateFuncs xs = \x -> map ($ x) xs

I was wondering whether the converse existed, i.e. is there a function

joinFuncs :: (a -> [b]) -> [a -> b]

I think not (mainly because lists are not fixed length), but perhaps I’ll be proved wrong.
The question then is there some datatype f which has a function :: (a -> f b) -> f (a -> b)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T16:47:13+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 4:47 pm

    You can generalize seperateFuncs to Applicative (or Monad) pretty cleanly:

    seperateFuncs :: (Applicative f) => f (a -> b) -> (a -> f b)
    seperateFuncs f x = f <*> pure x
    

    Written in point-free style, you have seperateFuncs = ((. pure) . (<*>)), so you basically want unap . (. extract), giving the following definition if you write it in pointful style:

    joinFuncs :: (Unapplicative f) => (a -> f b) -> f (a -> b)
    joinFuncs f = unap f (\ g -> f (extract g))
    

    Here I define Unapplictaive as:

    class Functor f => Unapplicactive f where
        extract  :: f a -> a
        unap     :: (f a -> f b) -> f (a -> b)
    

    To get the definitions given by leftaroundabout, you could give the following instances:

    instance Unapplicative [] where
        extract = head
        unap f = [\a -> f [a] !! i | i <- [0..]]
    
    instance Unapplicative ((->) c) where
        extract f = f undefined
        unap f = \x y -> f (const y) x
    

    I think it’s hard to come up with a “useful” function f :: (f a -> f b) -> f (a -> b) for any f that isn’t like (->).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have function getCartItems in cart.js and I want to call that function in
I have function Start() that is fired on ready. When I click on .ExampleClick
Inside my Controller i have function that runs after user clicks on item, which
I have function that will generate breadcrumbs format for my category e.g. Root->Children .
I have function that returns the index of a character GetCharFromPos(Pt: TPoint): Integer; now
In my specific case I have (function(){ and I want to replace that with
Let's say that we have function setAngle(x,y,z) which works perfectly. Now we also have
i have function that changes background color of element and src of image. in
I have function that scrolls to a anchor position in a list function snapToAnchor(anchor)
I have function getMemory() which returns VARIANT (mfc). It is said that in ulVal

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.