Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7719089
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T03:19:35+00:00 2026-06-01T03:19:35+00:00

I have a function that might fail, so the value it returns needs to

  • 0

I have a function that might fail, so the value it returns needs to be wrapped in a Maybe. It uses another function that might also fail, and that is also wrapped in a Maybe. The problem is, to get the types to work out in an intermediate calculation, I have to “prematurely” lift a function to work in the Maybe context. That results in my getting a type Maybe [Maybe Integer], when what I want is Maybe [Integer]. The function in question is the exptDecipherString function, the function that’s forcing “premature” lifting is the modularInverse function.

import Data.Char
import Control.Applicative
import Control.Monad
import Math.NumberTheory.Powers

--Helpers

extendedGcd::Integer->Integer->(Integer, Integer)
extendedGcd a b | r == 0 = (0, 1)
                | otherwise = (y, x - (y * d))
                where
                    (d, r) = a `divMod` b
                    (x, y) = extendedGcd b r

modularInverse::Integer->Integer->Maybe Integer
modularInverse n b | relativelyPrime n b = Just . fst $ extGcd n b
                   | otherwise = Nothing
                   where
                        extGcd = extendedGcd

relativelyPrime::Integer->Integer->Bool
relativelyPrime m n = gcd m n == 1 

textToDigits::String->[Integer]
textToDigits = map (\x->toInteger (ord x - 97)) 

digitsToText::[Integer]->String
digitsToText = map (\x->chr (fromIntegral x + 97)) 

--Exponentiation Ciphers

exptEncipher::Integer->Integer->Integer->Maybe Integer
exptEncipher m k p | relativelyPrime k (m - 1) = Just $ powerMod p k m 
                   | otherwise = Nothing

exptDecipher::Integer->Integer->Integer->Maybe Integer
exptDecipher m q c | relativelyPrime q (m - 1) = Just $ powerMod c q m
                   | otherwise = Nothing

exptEncipherString::Integer->Integer->String->Maybe [Integer]
exptEncipherString m k p | relativelyPrime k (m - 1) = mapM (exptEncipher m k) plaintext
                         | otherwise = Nothing
    where
        plaintext = textToDigits p

exptDecipherString::Integer->Integer->[Integer]->Maybe String
exptDecipherString m k c | relativelyPrime k (m - 1) = fmap digitsToText plaintext
                         | otherwise = Nothing
    where
        q = modularInverse k (m - 1)
        plaintext = mapM (exptDecipher m <$> q <*>) (map pure c)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T03:19:37+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 3:19 am

    The first thing you should usually try for “How can X become Y” is hoogle. In this case, it recommends you use join, which will collapse two Maybes into one.

    With some code restructuring, the Maybe monad could also be used to help you here.

    When all else fails, roll your own solution that uses functions or a case statement with pattern matching.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose we have a recursive function, f , that might fail if the input
What is the best way to handle a function that might occasional fail to
So I have function that formats a date to coerce to given enum DateType{CURRENT,
In my Java code I have function that gets file from the client in
I have function Start() that is fired on ready. When I click on .ExampleClick
I have a function that accepts a class (not an instance) and, depending on
I have a function that is being called from different threads in the application.
I have a function that allows users to edit a row in a table
I have a function that is recursively calling itself, and i want to detect
I have a function that pulls rows from a database, the content->id and content->type

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.