Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8770721
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T17:36:45+00:00 2026-06-13T17:36:45+00:00

I have a gem. It can optionally be run as a command line app

  • 0

I have a gem. It can optionally be run as a command line app myapp_cli, or as an app with a local web ui myapp_web.

When working on my app, I can run bundle exec myapp_cli for the command line UI, or
I can run bundle exec rackup for the web UI.

Now I’d like bin/myapp_web to essentially be a synonym for rackup. So when someone installs my gem, they can just run myapp_cli or myapp_web.

Is there a nice way of doing that?

I can make my myapp_web look like

Rack::Handler::WEBrick.run(
      App.new,
      :Port => 9000
  )

but that doesn’t give me all the goodies that rackup gives me.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T17:36:47+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 5:36 pm

    All I had to do was browse the source.

    require 'rack'
    Rack::Server.start
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a spork gem issue. Every time I run the spork command I
I have paypal_adaptive gem on my local development machine working. But when deployed heroku
I have this gem working such that I can change the id3 data for
I have a engine style Rails plugin from which I can create a gem
I am using the decent_exposure gem and have run into a quandry. I have
I have a rails 2.3.9 app that uses a gem and works perfectly fine
I have a gem that provides some rack middleware, the only way I can
I have created a gem that adds a new method to the class ActiveRecord::Base.
I am using the sentient_user gem to have access to the current_user object in
I'm a gem author. Is it OK to have symlinks in gem files, or

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.