Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 56733
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T17:34:51+00:00 2026-05-10T17:34:51+00:00

I have a generic class in C# with 2 constructors: public Houses(params T[] InitialiseElements)

  • 0

I have a generic class in C# with 2 constructors:

public Houses(params T[] InitialiseElements) {} public Houses(int Num, T DefaultValue) {} 

Constructing an object using int as the generic type and passing in two ints as arguments causes the ‘incorrect’ constructor to be called (from my point of view).

E.g. Houses<int> houses = new Houses<int>(1,2) – calls the 2nd construtor. Passing in any other number of ints into the constructor will call the 1st constructor.

Is there any way around this other than removing the params keyword and forcing users to pass an array of T when using the first constructor?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T17:34:51+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 5:34 pm

    A clearer solution would be to have two static factory methods. If you put these into a nongeneric class, you can also benefit from type inference:

    public static class Houses {     public static Houses<T> CreateFromElements<T>(params T[] initialElements)     {         return new Houses<T>(initialElements);     }      public Houses<T> CreateFromDefault<T>(int count, T defaultValue)     {         return new Houses<T>(count, defaultValue);     } } 

    Example of calling:

    Houses<string> x = Houses.CreateFromDefault(10, 'hi'); Houses<int> y = Houses.CreateFromElements(20, 30, 40); 

    Then your generic type’s constructor doesn’t need the ‘params’ bit, and there’ll be no confusion.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 180k
  • Answers 180k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm not 100 % sure, but my pretty confident guess… May 12, 2026 at 4:01 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Move the condition into the JOIN clause: SELECT IFNULL(SUM(s.qty),0) AS… May 12, 2026 at 4:01 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use the ActiveRecord::sanitize_sql_array method. ActiveRecord::sanitize_sql_array ['gm.group_id IN (?)',… May 12, 2026 at 4:01 pm

Related Questions

I'm dealing specifically with C++, but this is really language-agnostic. Just to give some
Does anyone know if it possible to define the equivalent of a java custom
I must be doing something wrong here (because really, what are the chances of
Platform: C# 2.0 WinForms I have a factory class that provides an instantiation of

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.