Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 182771
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T14:59:54+00:00 2026-05-11T14:59:54+00:00

I have a generic class which takes two type parameters, Generic<A, B> . This

  • 0

I have a generic class which takes two type parameters, Generic<A, B>. This class has methods with signatures that are distinct so long and A and B are distinct. However, if A == B the signatures match exactly and overload resolution cannot be performed. Is it possible to somehow specify a specialisation of the method for this case? Or force the compiler to arbitrarily choose one of the matching overloads?

using System;  namespace Test {     class Generic<A, B>     {         public string Method(A a, B b)         {             return a.ToString() + b.ToString();         }          public string Method(B b, A a)         {             return b.ToString() + a.ToString();         }     }      class Program     {         static void Main(string[] args)         {             Generic<int, double> t1 = new Generic<int, double>();             Console.WriteLine(t1.Method(1.23, 1));              Generic<int, int> t2 = new Generic<int, int>(); // Following line gives: //     The call is ambiguous between the following methods //     or properties: 'Test.Generic<A,B>.Method(A, B)' and //     'Test.Generic<A,B>.Method(B, A)'             Console.WriteLine(t2.Method(1, 2));            }     } } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 2 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T14:59:55+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:59 pm

    Thanks for the good answers, they prompted me into this solution:

    using System;  namespace Test {     class Generic<A, B>     {         public string Method(A a, B b)         {             return this.DefaultMethod(a, b);         }          protected string DefaultMethod(A a, B b)         {             return a.ToString() + b.ToString();         }          public string Method(B b, A a)         {             return b.ToString() + a.ToString();         }     }      class Generic<A> : Generic<A, A>     {         public new string Method(A a, A b)         {             return base.DefaultMethod(a, b);         }     }      class Program     {         static void Main(string[] args)         {             Generic<int, double> t1 = new Generic<int, double>();             Console.WriteLine(t1.Method(1.23, 1));              Generic<int> t2 = new Generic<int>();             Console.WriteLine(t2.Method(1, 2));         }     } } 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a generic class which takes two type parameters: public class MyGenericClass<T, S>
I have a generic class that takes a type T . Within this class
I have a generic type class Filter that has takes some lambda expressions to
I have a parameterized generic class X which takes a type T. On which
So I have a generic Matrix class that I created which has the following
I have a class which takes a type token, and then generates objects of
I have an interface which takes a generic type interface IIFace<T> Then i have
Assume I have a template (called ExampleTemplate) that takes two arguments: a container type
I have a generic interface IConstrained which is implemented by the generic Constrained class.
I have a class which provides generic access to LINQ to SQL entities, for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.