Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6805159
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T19:33:11+00:00 2026-05-26T19:33:11+00:00

I have a generic function which can speak to multiple other functions in appropriate

  • 0

I have a generic function which can speak to multiple other functions in appropriate objects is it possible to use a string to call the appropriate function.

 var string = "save";

 var generic = (new function (string) { 

                string."alert()";


               return this;
               })




 var save = (new function (string) { 

    this.alert = (function () {

              alert("your document has been saved")                    

              return this         

              })

        return this 
          })

var notSaved = (new function (string) { 

    this.alert = (function () {

              alert("your document has not been saved")                    

              return this         

              })

        return this 
          })

I am using it for a far more complex set up but here is an example. Is this possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T19:33:12+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 7:33 pm

    You can enclose your functions within some object so you can access by passing name of the property using some variable (in this case named string), eg. like that:

    var string = 'notSaved';
    var funcs = {};
    
    funcs.save = new function(){
        this.alert = function(){
            alert('called save.alert()');
        };
        return this;
    };
    
    funcs.notSaved = new function(){
        this.alert = function(){
            alert('called notSaved.alert()');
        };
        return this;
    };
    
    funcs[string].alert();
    

    See working example on jsfiddle.

    If your variables are global (they should not), they are also automatically enclosed within window object, so you can call them also like that: window[string].alert(). This will not work for non-global functions (in this case my solution seems to be the only one not using eval()).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a web service which has a generic function that returns a dataset
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript Function Definition in ASP User Control Hi, I have a generic
I have: void add_all_msgs(std::deque<Message>::iterator &iter); How can I make that function generic, so it
I have generic list which must be a preserved order so I can retrieve
I have strings which contains thousand separators, however no string-to-number function wants to consume
I want to create a generic to which I can pass a function as
I have a generic JavaScript function which takes one parameter function foo(val) { ...}
I want to have a generic function for a few types such as long,
I have a javascript function that calls a generic function to make an ajax
I have a function that accepts a generic parameter T that is of type

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.