Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 170605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T12:50:16+00:00 2026-05-11T12:50:16+00:00

I have a Generic Type Interface and want a constructor of an object to

  • 0

I have a Generic Type Interface and want a constructor of an object to take in the Generic Interface.
Like:

public Constructor(int blah, IGenericType<T> instance) {} 

I want the code that creates this object to specify the IGenericType (use Inversion of Control). I have not seen a way for this to happen. Any suggestions to accomplish this?

I want someone to create the object like:

Constructor varname = new Constructor(1, new GenericType<int>()); 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T12:50:16+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:50 pm

    You can’t make constructors generic, but you can use a generic static method instead:

    public static Constructor CreateInstance<T>(int blah, IGenericType<T> instance) 

    and then do whatever you need to after the constructor, if required. Another alternative in some cases might be to introduce a non-generic interface which the generic interface extends.

    EDIT: As per the comments…

    If you want to save the argument into the newly created object, and you want to do so in a strongly typed way, then the type must be generic as well.

    At that point the constructor problem goes away, but you may want to keep a static generic method anyway in a non-generic type: so you can take advantage of type inference:

    public static class Foo {     public static Foo<T> CreateInstance<T>(IGenericType<T> instance)     {         return new Foo<T>(instance);     } }  public class Foo<T> {     public Foo(IGenericType<T> instance)     {         // Whatever     } }  ...  IGenericType<string> x = new GenericType<string>(); Foo<string> noInference = new Foo<string>(x); Foo<string> withInference = Foo.CreateInstance(x); 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 81k
  • Answers 81k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The HttpContext object contains access to many other helpful items,… May 11, 2026 at 4:28 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Because your newly allocated stack is not DWORD aligned. Change… May 11, 2026 at 4:28 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer In IE6 and 7 it also appears to be 20.… May 11, 2026 at 4:28 pm

Related Questions

Suppose I have an interface for a service: public interface IFooService { void DoSomething();
I made a custom TObjectList descendant designed to hold subclasses of a base object
I have a problem with WCF. I think I understand what the issue is,
It looks like I had a fundamental misunderstanding about C++ :< I like the

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.