Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 463203
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T23:09:07+00:00 2026-05-12T23:09:07+00:00

I have a hierarchy of classes that all derive from a base type and

  • 0

I have a hierarchy of classes that all derive from a base type and the base type also implements an interface. What I’m wanting to do is have one controller to handle the management of the entire hierarchy (as the actions exposed via the controller is identical). That being said, I want to have the views have the type specific fields on it and the model binder to bind against a hidden field value. something like:

<input type="text" name="model.DerivedTypeSpecificField" />
<input type="hidden" name="modelType" value="MyDerivedType" />

That being said, the asp.net mvc model binders seem to require the concrete type that they will be creating, because of that reason I would need to create a different controller for every derived type.

Has anyone does this before or know how to manipulate the model binder to behave in this way? I could write my own model binder, but I’m not wanting anything past the basic model binding behavior of assign properties and building arrays on the target type.

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T23:09:07+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 11:09 pm

    Don’t know if it will work, but you can try something like:

    public class MyBinder : DefaultModelBinder
    {
        public override object BindModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
        {
            bindingContext.ModelType = System.Type.GetType(controllerContext.HttpContext.Request["modelType"]);
    
            return base.BindModel(controllerContext, bindingContext);
        }
    }
    

    That is just simple change of basic model binder.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a small hierarchy of classes that all implement a common interface. Each
I have an hierarchy of classes that I fetch from database by LINQ to
I have one main interface and an abstract class implementing all derivable methods (that
I have an hierarchy of classes that looks like the following: class Critical {
I have a hierarchy of classes that are serialised to XML using XMLSerialiser .
I have a hierarchy interface of IRoot where H is the hierarchy type and
I have an abstract class, AbsClass that implements an interface, IClass . IClass has
I have a hierarchy of worker classes, all of which do some kind of
I have quite a large hierarchy of classes that are Activities. I just installed
I have a hierarchy of classes mapped into hibernate that looks kind of like

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.