Home/ Questions/Q 880847
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-15T12:09:54+00:00

I have a Java application that has a fixed thread pool of fifteen, the

  • 0

I have a Java application that has a fixed thread pool of fifteen, the machine, Solaris 10 SPARC, has sixteen CPUs. Adding the pool has greatly increased performance, but I’m wondering if I have too many threads in the pool. Would performance be better with less threads or does Solaris do a good job of thread scheduling.

Say the pool is heavily using fifteen CPUs, then other application threads demand CPU for various reason, concurrent garbage collection is a good example. Now, five CPUs are shared between the pool and other application threads. Then CPUs one through seven become free, will Solaris move the threads sharing time on the busy CPUs to the free CPUs?

If not, would it be better to keep the pool size smaller, so that there are always free CPUs for other application threads? Compounding the issue, CPU usage is very sporadic in the application.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    If you are doing only cpu intensive tasks (no IO) N+1 threads (where N is the number of cores) will give you the optimum processor utilization.
    +1 because you can have a page fault, a therad can be paused to any reason or a small wait time during synchronization.

    For Threads doing IO this is not really easy, you have to test the best size.
    The book Java concurrency in practice suggests this algorithm as starting point:

    N = number of CPUs
U = target CPU utilization (0 <= U <= 1)
W/C = ration of wait time to cpu time (measured through profiling)

threads = N * U * (1 + W/C)

    IBM uses the same algorithm in their article Java theory and practice: Thread pools and work queues, with a fixed U=1.
    The N+1 fact can be read too in the IBM article, to provide origins for both theses.

    • 0