Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8550133
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T13:52:54+00:00 2026-06-11T13:52:54+00:00

I have a java interface with a method declared like this String type(); .

  • 0

I have a java interface with a method declared like this String type();. I want to implement it in a scala class, so I would like to write:

override def type = { ... }

But apparently its a reserved keyword in scala, so the compiler is complaining:

 identifier expected but 'type' found.

How is it possible to implement it? Is there a solution without having to change the Java interface?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T13:52:55+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 1:52 pm

    You can use backticks to overcome the issue of reserved words:

    override def `type` = { ... }
    

    See: Scala Interoperability FAQs

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to implement a generic java interface in scala. I have looked at:
I have an interface defining a method like this : public List<IA> myMethod(); with
In my JEE6-CDI-webapp, i declared a Security Interceptor, like this one: //Secure.java @Inherited @Target({TYPE,
If I have a list of elements I would like to sort, Java offers
Suppose i have a interface like this, interface MyIntf{ void generate(); } and a
I have a Java problem with nested classes. My first class structure looked like
Starting with one Java base-interface, I want others to be able to extend this
I have declared the following interface in Java: public interface ITest { void doStuff();
If a Java class implements the Serializable interface but does not have a public
I'm working with java. I have an interface that has an annotated method in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.