Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 123241
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T04:15:19+00:00 2026-05-11T04:15:19+00:00

I have a javascript file that reads another file which may contain javascript fragments

  • 0

I have a javascript file that reads another file which may contain javascript fragments that need to be eval()-ed. The script fragments are supposed to conform to a strict subset of javascript that limits what they can do and which variables they can change, but I want to know if there is some way to enforce this by preventing the eval from seeing variables in the global scope. Something like the following:

function safeEval( fragment ) {     var localVariable = g_Variable;      {         // do magic scoping here so that the eval fragment can see localVariable         // but not g_Variable or anything else outside function scope          eval( fragment );     } } 

The actual code doesn’t need to look like this–I’m open to any and all weird tricks with closures, etc. But I do want to know if this is even possible.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T04:15:20+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 4:15 am

    Short answer: No. If it’s in the global scope, it’s available to anything.

    Long answer: if you’re eval()ing untrusted code that really wants to read or mess with your execution environment, you’re screwed. But if you own and trust all code being executed, including that being eval()ed, you can fake it by overriding the execution context:

    function maskedEval(scr) {     // set up an object to serve as the context for the code     // being evaluated.      var mask = {};     // mask global properties      for (p in this)         mask[p] = undefined;      // execute script in private context     (new Function( 'with(this) { ' + scr + '}')).call(mask); } 

    Again, I must stress:

    This will only serve to shield trusted code from the context in which it is executed. If you don’t trust the code, DO NOT eval() it (or pass it to new Function(), or use it in any other way that behaves like eval()).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 137k
  • Answers 137k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would say both syntax do exactly the same thing...… May 12, 2026 at 7:20 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes, you have to enforce data integrity yourself in the… May 12, 2026 at 7:20 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The code you have just call the copy constructor, this… May 12, 2026 at 7:20 am

Related Questions

I have been working on a project that dynamically creates a javascript file using
I'm looking to achieve the following. I have an initially-empty absolutely positioned div (#description)
I'm driving a web services load test using a system of WSF, VBS and
I really hope someone can help with this problem. I have an ajax pagination

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.