Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 212825
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:13:20+00:00 2026-05-11T18:13:20+00:00

I have a junction table in my SQL Server 2005 database that consist of

  • 0

I have a junction table in my SQL Server 2005 database that consist of two columns:

  • object_id (uniqueidentifier)

  • property_id (integer)

These values together make a compound primary key.

What’s the best way to create this PK index for SELECT performance?

If the columns were two integers, I would just use a compound clustered index (the default). However, I’ve heard bad things about clustered indexes when uniqueidentifiers are involved.

Anyone have experience with this situation?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:13:20+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:13 pm

    Yes, GUID’s are really bad for clustered indexes, since the GUIDs is by design very random and thus leads to massive fragmentation and thus performance problems.

    See Kim Tripp’s blog – most notably “The CLustered Index Debate continues” and “GUIDs as PRIMARY and/or CLUSTERED key” – for a lot of valuable background info.

    If you really need to have an index on these TWO columns, I’d suggest a non-clustered index – it can be a primary index – just better not a clustered index.

    Marc

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 199k
  • Answers 199k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Problems I typically have include: Misconfigured productions settings, whether in… May 12, 2026 at 7:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Is this your task, or his? If its his, let… May 12, 2026 at 7:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try this: $("Table.alternate tr:not('[class*=rowSkip]')").each well if your class is always… May 12, 2026 at 7:41 pm

Related Questions

How would you represent a temporal many-to-many relation in SQL? Under non-temporal circumstances one
may someone could help me on one problem in query LINQ to SQL Visual
I am looking to optimize my LINQ query because although it works right, the
Suppose I have a junction table EmployeeId DeptId --------- ------ 1 1 1 2

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.