Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8882223
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T20:31:24+00:00 2026-06-14T20:31:24+00:00

I have a Kd-Tree implementation, which is templatized to accept any dimension greater than

  • 0

I have a Kd-Tree implementation, which is templatized to accept any dimension greater than 0 and any floating-point type (float, double, etc…). Something like this:

template <typename real, size_t dimensions> class KdTree
{
    // stuff
}

And I have an accompanying “point” type which has the exact same template layout. However this point type needs to be accessible from outside the kd-tree class. Now, every time I need to create temporary points inside my kd-tree code, I need to explicitly go KdPoint<real, dimensions>, which is tiresome, makes my lines really long, and adds no value whatsoever to the code.

Is there any way I can tell the compiler to implicitly assume whatever values for real and dimensions were passed to the class for the points as well? Linking the two template lists together, in a way. So that I can just type KdPoint and the compiler will directly know what to put in there, based on the template arguments the class received.

Otherwise I’ll need to use a macro to explicitly expand the latter into the former, which kind of sucks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T20:31:25+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 8:31 pm

    You could add a typedef to the KdTree class:

    template <typename real, size_t dimensions> class KdTree
    {
      typedef KdPoint<real, dimensions> KdPoint_;
      // stuff
    };
    

    and use KdPoint_ internally. If you want the point type to be accessible externally, give the typedef public access, and a name that doesn-t end in _:

    template <typename real, size_t dimensions> class KdTree
    {
     public:
      typedef KdPoint<real, dimensions> KdPointType;
      // stuff
    };
    

    This can then be accessed like this:

    KdTree<float, 5>::KdPointType
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

i have the following code, taken partly from a Red Black Tree Java implementation.
I have a tree in which i want the onOpen and onClose to be
I'm going to write a templatized implementation of a KDTree, which for now should
This has already been discussed here , but I have an implementation below (which
I have a red black tree algorithm which is working fine. When a node
We have a collapsible tree implementation in our web app. I need to add
I have created my own Tree implementation for various reasons and have come up
For one of my projects I have a tree of QObject derived objects, which
Please have a look: So basically I have a tree like architecture which is
I have created an AVL tree implementation, but as an AVL tree is quite

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.