Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 937047
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T21:24:42+00:00 2026-05-15T21:24:42+00:00

I have a large (150m+ row) table, which is partitioned into quarters using a

  • 0

I have a large (150m+ row) table, which is partitioned into quarters using a DATE partition key.

When I query the table using something like…

SELECT *
FROM   LARGE_TABLE
WHERE  THE_PARTITION_DATE >= TO_DATE('1/1/2009', 'DD/MM/YYYY')
AND    THE_PARTITION_DATE < TO_DATE('1/4/2009', 'DD/MM/YYYY');

… partition pruning works correctly… the optomiser is able to realise that it only needs to look at a single partition (in this case Q1 2009). EXPLAIN PLAN shows “PARTITION RANGE SINGLE”

However, when I move this query to PL/SQL and pass in the same dates as variables, the plan is showing as “PARTITION RANGE (ITERATOR)”… the optomiser is unable to understand that it only needs to look at the single partiiton (presumably because it doesn’t have the actual values when it’s evaluating the plan).

The only workaround I’ve found round so far is to code an EXECUTE IMMEDIATE including the dates in the SQL string so that the partition pruning works correctly.

Is there a better way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T21:24:43+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:24 pm

    I don’t think you should see an actual performance difference with the bind variables – you should see an execution plan step of “PARTITION RANGE ITERATOR PARTITION: KEY KEY…” which means Oracle will determine the start and stop partitions at execution time.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.