Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 945001
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T22:41:04+00:00 2026-05-15T22:41:04+00:00

I have a large batch insert using SubSonic which takes about 10s (sometimes more),

  • 0

I have a large batch insert using SubSonic which takes about 10s (sometimes more), will this produce any problems if my website tries to open another connection to my sql server?

This batch won’t happend that often, but I guess it will happend at the same time as an other connection at some point.

And a related question: How many connections can sql server have at once?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T22:41:05+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:41 pm

    SQL Server can handle simultaneous batches just fine. Of course, it’s possible that your insert batch locks certain table rows. That will block other transactions from completing until the batch is finished.

    The usual limit on SQL Server connections is the max pool size of the connection pool on the client.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two batch files which is used to run a large C++ build,
I want to do something: i have a LARGE batch file, but this is
I have a very large (~6GB) SVN repository, for which I've written a batch
I want to compare two folders on Windows (Vista, XP) which have a large
We have a few C++ solutions and we run some build scripts using batch
I have a large set of directories for which I'm trying to calculate the
I am writing a batch and using JPA for persistence. I have a table
I'm working on processing a large csv file and I found this article about
I have a conceptual question. Suppose I have a procedure (any language) which takes
I have a daily batch process that involves selecting out a large number of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.