Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6019167
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T03:22:53+00:00 2026-05-23T03:22:53+00:00

I have a large collection of unique strings (about 500k). Each string is associated

  • 0

I have a large collection of unique strings (about 500k). Each string is associated with a vector of strings. I’m currently storing this data in a

map<string, vector<string> >

and it’s working fine. However I’d like the look-up into the map to be faster than log(n). Under these constrained circumstances how can I create a hashtable that supports O(1) look-up? Seems like this should be possible since I know all the keys ahead of time… and all the keys are unique (so I don’t have to account for collisions).

Cheers!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T03:22:54+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 3:22 am

    You can create a hashtable with boost::unordered_map, std::tr1::unordered_map or (on C++0x compilers) std::unordered_map. That takes almost zero effort. Google sparsehash may be faster still and tends to take less memory. (Deletion can be a pain, but it seems you won’t need that.)

    If the code is still not fast enough, you can exploit prior knowledge of the keys with a minimal perfect hash, as suggested by others, to obtain guaranteed O(1) performance. Whether the code generating effort that takes is worth it depends on you; putting 500k keys into a tool like gperf may take a code generator generator.

    You may also want to look at CMPH, which generates a perfect hash function at run-time, though through a C API.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a large collection of small objects, each has a unique string ident.
I have a large collection of data in an excel file (and csv files).
We have a large internal data collection website. I don't have time to create
I have a large collection of strings (up to 1M) alphabetically sorted. I have
I have a large collection of data chunks sized 1kB (in the order of
I have a large amount of unique strings for which I want to compute
Problem: I have a large collection of points. Each of these points has a
Let's say I have a large collection of elements. Each element has a position
I have a Mongo collection where each document has a set of unique embedded
I have a large collection of retro games consoles and computers, I want to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.