Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8560029
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T16:11:07+00:00 2026-06-11T16:11:07+00:00

I have a large data frame in which I am multiplying two columns together

  • 0

I have a large data frame in which I am multiplying two columns together to get another column. At first I was running a for-loop, like so:

for(i in 1:nrow(df)){
    df$new_column[i] <- df$column1[i] * df$column2[i]
}

but this takes like 9 days.

Another alternative was plyr, and I actually might be using the variables incorrectly:

new_df <- ddply(df, .(column1,column2), transform, new_column = column1 * column2)

but this is taking forever

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T16:11:08+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 4:11 pm

    As Blue Magister said in comments,

    df$new_column <- df$column1 * df$column2
    

    should work just fine. Of course we can never know for sure if we don’t have an example of the data.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a large data frame with date variables, which reflect first day of
I have two large data frames, a and b for which identical(a,b) is TRUE
I have a large data frame with 48 columns, and I want to run
I have a large data.frame displaying some weird properties when plotted. I'd like to
I have a large data frame with the following fields (example data). #dput(data) gives...
I have a large data.frame, and I'd like to be able to reduce it
I have a large data frame (named z ) that looks like this: RPos
I'm working with a large data frame, and have run up against RAM limits.
I want to rename some random columns of a large data frame and I
I have a large file which contains lots of data, and I'd like to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.