Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 112185
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T02:30:17+00:00 2026-05-11T02:30:17+00:00

I have a large query (not written by me, but I’m making some modifications).

  • 0

I have a large query (not written by me, but I’m making some modifications). One thing that kind of bugs me is that I’ve got the same COALESCE function in about four places. Is there a way to factor that out, possibly by joining with a select from DUAL? Is there a performance benefit to factoring it out?

Here is the query slightly bolwderized:

select  tbl1.gid [snip]          ,COALESCE(t1_end_dt, t6_actl_end_dt,t6_calc_end_dt) perd_end_dt         ,t1_end_dt FROM    tbl1 .... JOIN    tbl2               ON (t2_pk          = wpck_wrkr_id  AND                                             t2_ind_1    ='Y'    AND         COALESCE(t1_end_dt, t6_actl_end_dt, t6_calc_end_dt)          BETWEEN  t2_strt_dt AND t2_end_dt) JOIN    tbl3                ON (t3_pk               = t2_fk_t3_pk AND        COALESCE(t1_end_dt, t6_actl_end_dt, t6_calc_end_dt)          BETWEEN t3_strt_dt AND t3_end_dt)     LEFT JOIN tbl4 tbl4_a             ON (tbl4_a.t4_pk         = chkw_wkt_id) ..... GROUP BY tbl1.gid  .....         ,COALESCE(t1_end_dt, t6_actl_end_dt, t6_calc_end_dt)         ,COALESCE(tbl4_b.t4_or_id, tbl4_a.t4_or_id, t7_or_id )         ,t1_end_dt ORDER BY perd_end_dt 

Note that I already factored out one of the COALESCEs by naming it pred_end_dt in the SELECT and then referring to it by that name in the ORDER BY.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T02:30:18+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:30 am

    You should be able to replace the occurrence in the GROUP BY clause with your column alias perd_end_dt. But the occurrences in JOIN conditions cannot use the column alias.

    This does have an impact on performance. I don’t think the JOIN conditions can use an index the way they are written currently. However, it’s only one term in the JOIN condition, so the impact might be very slight. That is, the terms involving t2_pk and t2_ind_1 may already reduce the rowset so the date comparison only has to deal with a small set. It depends on how many rows we’re talking about and how the data is distributed.

    One way to factor out the COALESCE() and take advantage of indexing would be to create a redundant column which is the result of that expression. Use triggers to make sure it has the right value after every insert or update. Then index the column.

    But like I said, it might be more trouble than it’s worth. It’d be more work, and you should be sure that this change would make the code more maintainable, more correct, or more speedy.


    Another option would be to define an alias for the COALESCE() expression in a subquery. I can’t tell which tables the columns come from, because you’re not qualifying them with table aliases. But if I can assume they’re all columns of tbl1:

    ... FROM (     SELECT COALESCE(t1_end_dt, t6_actl_end_dt, t6_calc_end_dt) perd_end_dt,       t1_fk_t2_pk     FROM tbl1) t1   JOIN tbl2     ON (tbl2.t2_pk = t1.t1_fk_t2_pk AND tbl2.t2_ind_1 = 'Y'       AND t1.perd_end_dt BETWEEN tbl2.t2_strt_dt AND tbl2.t2_end_dt) ... 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.