Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5849657
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T13:01:53+00:00 2026-05-22T13:01:53+00:00

I have a legacy class that I quickly want to write a couple of

  • 0

I have a legacy class that I quickly want to write a couple of tests for. Unfortunately we have a singleton call in the constructer, and not enough time at present to refactor it as it should.

function __construct(){

   $this->_dbConnect = DbConnect::getInstance();
  // very long constructer (sigh) omitted below ...
}

Is it acceptable practice to do this, so as to have mockable legacy code :

function __construct(DbConnect $dbConnect = null){

    $this->_dbConnect = isset($dbConnect) ? $dbConnect : DbConnect::getInstance(); 

   // <snip>
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T13:01:54+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 1:01 pm

    If you want to test only this class – yes, it’s normal code.

    Sorry for 1-line answer, but your question contains answer already 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a legacy class that the class itself is not a generic but
I have a legacy Java (not my native language) app that I'm trying to
I have a legacy class that is rather complex to maintain: class OldClass {
I have a legacy delphi dll. I created a class library that imports the
We have a legacy application that has a class like this : public class
We have a legacy 3rd party program that is failing with the error Class
I have a legacy database that I connect to and not sure why I
I have a legacy DLL written in C that I'd like to call from
I have a architecture question about legacy. For example I have a class that
I have a legacy database that uses a table per class hierarchy inheritance strategy

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.