Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 64009
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T18:43:21+00:00 2026-05-10T18:43:21+00:00

I have a library A, that I develop. When I deploy it on a

  • 0

I have a library A, that I develop. When I deploy it on a machine, the corresponding libA.so and libA-X.Y.Z.so are put in /usr/lib (X.Y.Z being the version number).

Now I develop a library B, which uses A. When I link B, I use the flag -lA. Then ‘ldd libB.so‘ gives me :

(...) libA-X.Y.Z.so => /usr/lib/libA-X.Y.Z.so (...) 

My problem is that when I release a new version of A (X.Y.ZZ), I also have to release a new version of B. Otherwise, someone installing the latest A won’t be able to install B which will be looking for the version X.Y.Z which doesn’t exist.

How do I solve this problem ? How can I tell B to look for libA.so and not libA-X.Y.Z.so ? Or is it wrong to do so ? even unsafe ?

Update 1 : library A (that I inherited from someone else) uses autotools.

Update 2 : when I build library A, I can see : ‘-Wl,-soname -Wl,libA-0.6.1.so’. If I understand properly that means that we are forcing the soname to be libA-0.6.1.so. Is that right ? Now my problem is that I have no clue how to modify this behaviour in a project which uses autotools. I googled for a while but can’t find any useful information. Should I modify configure.in or a Makefile.am ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T18:43:22+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 6:43 pm

    When you create libA.so, pass the -soname option to the linker (if you linking through gcc, use -Wl,-soname). Then, when B gets linked, the linker refers to A through its soname, not through its filename. On the target system, make sure you have a link from the soname to the real file. See

    http://www.linux.org/docs/ldp/howto/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 124k
  • Answers 124k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Are you running on OS 3.0? I saw the same… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It looks like you need to register Apache::Session::Memcached with Apache::Session::Wrapper,… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use DATENAME or DATEPART: SELECT DATENAME(dw,GETDATE()) -- Friday SELECT DATEPART(dw,GETDATE())… May 12, 2026 at 1:19 am

Related Questions

I have a C++ DLL (no code) that I want to expose to .NET
I develop a variety of applications and have 3-4 miscellaneous libraries that I reuse
A line in this answer , Get used to using the Mac on its
I am using Eclipse 3.4.2 to develop my code. As part of my project

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.