Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7596021
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T21:49:04+00:00 2026-05-30T21:49:04+00:00

I have a library of functions that is packaged up as a gem. One

  • 0

I have a library of functions that is packaged up as a gem. One of these functions requires the use of a third-party gem that itself has a long list of dependencies.

Is there a way that I can set up my gem so that users can install it and use those functions in the gem that don’t have the third-party dependency without the runtime complaining?

I want an exception to be raised when the method with the dependency is called, but the user should be able to use the other functions without a runtime error.

Is this possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T21:49:06+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 9:49 pm

    You can split your functions to modules (maybe modules to files too) that are depending or not depending gem. including GemDependent module trying to require your gem if not then redefine all gem dependent functions to raise exception.

    module YourFunctions
      module GemDependent
    
        def self.included(klass)
          require "yourgem"
        rescue LoadError
          instance_methods.each do |m|
            define_method(m) { raise "you need yourgem to run #{m}" }
          end
        end
    
        def gem_dependent_function
        end
      end
    
      include GemDependent
    
      def no_dependent_function
      end
    end
    
    include YourFunctions
    gem_dependent_function
    #  "you need yourgem to run gem_dependent_function"
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have to use an extern library providing lots of free functions that do
I have a solution that has three projects: WPF Application Class Library NUnit Testing
I have a C++ library and a C++ application trying to use functions and
I have to import library which is called functions.sage . How can I do
Suppose we have a shared library named libtest.so, there is one function foo in
I have a library made in C++/GDI that I am trying to port to
I have developed a big library of functions in R. For the moment I
I wonder how to find/link a library without any FIND_PACKAGE. Assume that we have
Lets say I have a library function that I cannot change that produces an
Does R6RS or Chez Scheme v7.9.4 have a library function to check if a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.