Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6933043
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T11:46:53+00:00 2026-05-27T11:46:53+00:00

I have a linq query for project euler problem 243: var y = from

  • 0

I have a linq query for project euler problem 243:

var y = from n in factors
        from m in factors where m != n
        select n * m;

The problem is, for prime factors 2 and 3, it produces the y = {6, 6} where it needs to just be {6}.

Is there a way to do this without calling y.Distinct() or y.Contains() multiple times?

I also thought about using two foreach loops, but the problem is – I can’t use indexing so it’d just be cumbersome and awkward.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T11:46:54+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 11:46 am

    As stated by Rick Sladkey, changing

        from m in factors where m != n
    

    to

        from m in factors where m < n
    

    produces the correct result without having to use .Distinct().

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say that I have LINQ query such as: var authors = from x in
I have a Linq query that looks something like this: var myPosse = from
I have a LINQ query to a DataTable : var list = from row
I have a Linq query that looks something like this: var query = from
i have a linq query to get data from a database. something like: Repository.Query<Project>.Where(r=>r.IsActive).OrderBy(r=>r.Date);
I have a GridView that is built from a Linq query as follows var
I have a LINQ query that returns some object like this... var query =
Say I have a linq query select r in db.Roles where r.RoleName DOES NOT
I have a DropDownList populated from a LINQ query. As per the design requirements
I have a linq query that works just fine but when StyleCop is run

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.