Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 908111
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T16:39:53+00:00 2026-05-15T16:39:53+00:00

I have a List and two threads that using the List. The first thread

  • 0

I have a List and two threads that using the List.

The first thread is getting new connections, each new connection is added to the List.

The second thread looping over the List to handle the connections (using foreach).

The problem is that sometimes while the second thread is looping over the List, the List changes before the loop ends. I even tried creating a new copy of the list and looping over it. But it produces some other problems.

I don’t want to create a new thread to handle each new connection, because I understood that too many threads can hurt performance. Is there any other way to handle the connections?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T16:39:54+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 4:39 pm

    2 problems.

    1) You need locking around the list.
    You need to ensure you have mutual exclusive access to the list, so it can’t be enumerated over while it’s modified.
    A first solution is to use locks:

    class Mailbox {
        List<int> list;
    
        void Send(int a) {
             lock(list) {
                  list.Add(a);
             }
         }
    
         int Receive() {
             lock(list) {
                 // Enumerate
                 return ...;
             }
          }
    }
    

    More elegantly, you could use one of the new collections in the Concurrent namespace, like BlockingCollection. The latter in not enumeration-safe, but provides a Take() method that can be used to retrieve objects from it, while producers are inserting them.

    2) Avoid creating a gazillion threads.
    You could use the .NET thread pool to enqueue as many request as you like, and the framework will take care of mapping them onto actual threads, without killing the system.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two threads, a producer thread that places objects into a generic List
I have std::list<Info> infoList in my application that is shared between two threads. These
I have two list on my request on jsp. First one is productGroupName, and
i have two list, i wanted to update the second list while adding a
I have two list of different objects : List<Report> List<Newsletter> each having a 'created
I have two threads, a consumer and a producer. The consumer thread is the
we have two threads accessing one list via a synchronized method. Can we a)
Is there a pre-implemented linked list out there that would have been implemented using
I have one std::list<> container and these threads: One writer thread which adds elements
I'm getting an weird error using queues/multiprocessing. I basically have a function that takes

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.