Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8530997
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T09:23:00+00:00 2026-06-11T09:23:00+00:00

I have a list of items which I need to process sequentially (but on

  • 0

I have a list of items which I need to process sequentially (but on a separate worker thread so to maintain UI responsiveness). The important thing to note is that these items can run for a long time (5 – 10 seconds).

Task<bool> currentTask = null;

foreach (var item in items)
{
    var currentItem = item;

    // Add a new task to the sequential task queue
    if (currentTask == null)
        currentTask = Task.Factory.StartNew<bool>(() => 
        { 
            return currentItem.ProcessItem(); 
        }, processCancelTokenSource.Token);
    else
        currentTask = currentTask.ContinueWith<bool>(t => 
        { 
            return currentItem.ProcessItem(); 
        }, processCancelTokenSource.Token);

    // Update UI after each task completes
    currentTask.ContinueWith(t =>
    {
        if (t.IsCanceled)
            currentItem.State = State.Cancelled;
        else
        {
            if (t.Result)
                currentItem.State = State.Complete;
            else
                currentItem.State = State.Failed;
        }
    },TaskScheduler.FromCurrentSynchronizationContext());
}

Now, I am using a CancellationToken to cancel the processing of the queue (there is a “Cancel Processing” button).

The problem is that this does not cancel the Task which is currently being executed. If CancellationTokenSource.Cancel() is called, then all the tasks waiting to be executed in the queue will be cancelled and their item’s currentItem.State will be set to State.Cancelled, which is correct. The problem is that the task which was executing at the time of the cancellation will continue to execute until it is finished and then be set to State.Complete or State.Failed. This is not ideal for two reasons: (1) the task is still running after the cancellation, (2) the state is not set to State.Cancelled because t.IsCanceled is not true.

Is there a way for me to safely cancel/stop the currently executing Task?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T09:23:01+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 9:23 am

    Tasks supports graceful cancellation pattern. CancellationToken is just a token. It doesn’t interrupt any executing code or aborting a thread. You should check this token in task body yourself.

    One point to remember: if you want to get your current task cancelled, cancel it via CancellationToken.ThrowIfCancellationRequested method, not just exiting from task body.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a list which is dynamically built, but there are empty list items
I have a list of items ('sections') which has a getter and a setter.
I have a List<MyClass> with 2 items which have a SequenceNumber property. If I
I have a list of items of type ViewLookupItem which has these properties: For
I have a list of items, which has two values, a name and an
I have a page with a list of elements display (items) - which are
I have a list which has repeating items and I want a list of
I have a list which contains some items of type string. List<string> lstOriginal; I
I have a method which is list my items from a server. Therefore, this
I have a listbox which acts as a list of items. If you click

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.