Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6346785
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T21:05:07+00:00 2026-05-24T21:05:07+00:00

I have a list of objects which have 2 string attributes and a few

  • 0

I have a list of objects which have 2 string attributes and a few double attributes each – there are duplicate rows in the sense that the string attributes are the same, while the double attributes are different. I’m trying to merge these duplicates into a single new row that is computed from the values of the double attributes. Simplified example:

1. A, Text1, 5
2. A, Text2, 4
3. B, Text1, 7
4. A, Text1, 3

Taking the ‘computed row’ as a simple average, I should end up with:

1. A, Text1, 4 (5+3)/2
2. A, Text2, 4
3. B, Text1, 7

This is what I’m doing at the moment:

var groups = (from t in MyList group t by new { t.Field1, t.Field2});
foreach (var @group in groups)
{
   if (@group.Count() > 1)
   {         
      var newRow = new MyObject
                       {
                          Field1 = @group.ElementAt(0).Field1,
                          Field2 = @group.ElementAt(0).Field2,
                          Field3 = @group.Average(i => i.Field3)
                       };                        
   }
}

Which works fine. I’m just not sure how to replace the rows in the groups I’m iterating over, as there are no remove methods available for the groups. I had originally tried to do this with a coupe of nested for loop comparisons, but since I couldn’t modify the list I was iterating over I stored matching indexes, but that meant that I had n*(n-1)/2 matches…

Am I missing a perfectly simple way to do this? I can’t believe it’s very difficult, but I haven’t been able to work it out yet.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T21:05:08+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 9:05 pm

    Answering my own question rather than deleting it as it might be of use to someone who had a similar brainblock:

    I was overcomplicating things – I have ended up just creating and returning a new list with the new rows + the rows that did not need processing.

    var groups = (from t in MyList group t by new { t.Field1, t.Field2 });
    var returnList = new List<MyObject>();
    foreach (var @group in groups)
    { 
       returnList.Add(new TradeScore
                          {
                             Field1 = @group.ElementAt(0).Field1,
                             Field2 = @group.ElementAt(0).Field2,
                             Field3 = @group.Average(i => i.Field3)
                          });
    }
    return returnList;
    

    Simples.

    Note this does do the processing on all groups, even those with only 1 item. Although they don’t need to be processed, the average of one value is obviously that value, and it avoids the extra if(...) {process and add} else {add}. I doubt the overhead will be noticeable but it’s something to keep an eye on.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have List objects which are shown like this: www.mysite.com/lists/123 Where 123 is the
I have a list of objects which need to be output 2 items per
I have a list of objects which I store in the session. This list
I have a list of objects which I want to turn into a set.
I have a list of objects which needs to be persisted in a SQL
I have a list of person objects which I want to send in response
I have a List which contains a list of objects and I want to
I have IQueryable list of objects of type T which I want to transform
I have a list of objects, some of which can be null. I want
I have a List of Java objects on my server which is sent to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.