Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 567289
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:04:02+00:00 2026-05-13T13:04:02+00:00

I have a logic question: If I have: f(A,B,C,D) = M(4,7,8,11).D(1,2,13,14) what would be

  • 0

I have a logic question:

If I have: f(A,B,C,D) = M(4,7,8,11).D(1,2,13,14)

what would be the sum of products for that using k-map (please note that this is big-m and you have to find the answer in the sum of products)

I drew the k-map, the problem is, I can’t find a way to cover the zeros without having to state 4 terms each with 4 boolean terms (A,B,C,and D) without using the D terms, is that right?

Note: this is a homework question, i don’t want the answer as much as i want to be able to solve this myself.

   +---+---+---+---+
00 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
   +---+---+---+---+
01 | x | 1 | x | 1 |
   +---+---+---+---+
11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
   +---+---+---+---+
10 | x | 1 | x | 1 |
   +---+---+---+---+
     00  01  11  10

I edited the map because it was made for little m and this is big m

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:04:03+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:04 pm

    It looks like this:

    \ AB 00 01  11  10
    CD +---+---+---+---+
    00 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
       +---+---+---+---+
    01 | x | 0 | x | 0 |
       +---+---+---+---+
    11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
       +---+---+---+---+
    10 | x | 0 | x | 0 |
       +---+---+---+---+
    
    Simplest answer = OR(AND(*,*,*,*), AND(*,*,*,*), AND(*,*,*,*), AND(*,*,*,*)) where
    You can use A, B, C, D, NOT(A), NOT(B), NOT(C), NOT(D) instead of *
    ===================================================================
    

    Haha, this questions is constructed like that on purpose!

    They asked you for worst case imaginable.

    The don’t-cares do not help AT ALL and the ones aren’t next to each other.

    When you have the (at most 4×4 because you can visualize that) K-map drawn out, do not bother to cover zeroes instead of ones hoping that it will be simpler.

    When in k-map, it should be all there in front of you.

    This was a trick question. For extra points you can reason why the circuit is not simplifiable, perhaps look it up in the literature. Also, there is a great deal of symmetry here, so perhaps you can get creative when you draw out the corresponding circuit. If you do it right, the picture should look very nice.

    EDIT:

    You can install this software for Linux and play with it:

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/gkmap/

    It should convince you that your function is not simplifiable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to ask some logic question here. Let say I have a
I have authentication logic that uses cookies. The model attributes are initialized from cookies,
I have some logic in a method that operates on a specified type and
I have some logic that depends upon two properties being set, as it executes
So here is the problem: I have some logic in my application that will
In XCode 4.2, I have some logic tests that I want to exercise against
This is more of a logic question than a coding question. I am building
This is a general logic question, common to most introductory language and machines courses.
I have the problem that I'm instanciating an object on the UI-thread (WinForms). This
I have a tricky question. As everyone knows, Apple clearly says that ONE UIViewController

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.