Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 917653
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T18:14:40+00:00 2026-05-15T18:14:40+00:00

I have a long-running program on a remote machine and want to be sure

  • 0

I have a long-running program on a remote machine and want to be sure that (1) I have a record of any exception that causes it to terminate and (2) someone is notified if it terminates. Does anyone see drawbacks to the method I am using? (or have recommendations for a better one?)

I’ve read the Python docs and many exception-related posts here, and understand that blanket except clauses are usually a bad idea. Within subroutines and modules I always
use except to handle specific expected exceptions, but it seems useful to have a “catch-all” except clause at the highest level of the program to ensure I can log the exception before the program exits.

What do you think?

import traceback
try:
    # main program code here
except BaseException:
    tb = traceback.format_exc()
    msg = "Exiting program due to exception:" + tb
    LogToFile(msg)         # custom logging function
    SendAlertEmail(msg)    # warn admin that program terminated
    raise                  # program exits with the existing exception

Note that I was using BaseException instead of Exception because if someone at the terminal presses Ctrl-C, I would like to log that as the reason for exiting the program (and alert an admin that the program was exited). But I suppose I could also use:

except Exception, KeyboardInterrupt:
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T18:14:40+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 6:14 pm

    There is no specific drawback, but there is an excellent alternative — sys.excepthook.

    In your specific version, consider using a bare except:, and sys.exc_info() to get the exception information; that will ensure you do catch everything — even in the weird case where some module raises something else than an instance of a subclass of BaseException. E.g.:

    >>> class X: pass
    ... 
    >>> raise X
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
    __main__.X: <__main__.X instance at 0xc9ad0>
    

    As you see, it is still possible to raise something a except BaseException: would not catch — that’s why bare-except except: still exists (specifically for very special uses such as yours!).

    Whether you use the hook, or build your own, consider (perhaps depending on configuration flags or environment settings) not burdening the end-user with all the details (just as a neat touch of improved user experience!), just a meaningful summary (reassuring the user that all details of the problem have been recorded, etc, etc).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a long running SQL statement that I want to run, and no
I have a long running process in VB6 that I want to finish before
I have several long running report type transactions that take 5-10 minutes. Would I
I have a long running insert transaction that inserts data into several related tables.
I have a very long-running stored procedure in SQL Server 2005 that I'm trying
I have a web application that needs to fire off a long-running SQL Server
I have an ASP.NET site that has been running perfectly for a long time,
I have a long-running multithreaded program, and I'd like to occasionally like to call
I have a long running loop in an unfortunately large excel file that I'm
I have a long running series of operations in a .NET 2.0 BackgroundWorker thread.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.