Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6117293
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T15:18:15+00:00 2026-05-23T15:18:15+00:00

I have a loop of intensive calculations, I want them to be accelerated using

  • 0
  1. I have a loop of intensive calculations, I want them to be
    accelerated using the multicore processor as they are independent:
    all performed in parallel. What the easiest way to do that in
    python?
  2. Let’s imagine that those calculations have to be summed at the end. How to easily add them to a list or a float variable?

Thanks for all your pedagogic answers and using python libraries ;o)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T15:18:15+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 3:18 pm

    From my experience, multi-threading is probably not going to be a viable option for speeding things up (due to the Global Interpreter Lock).

    A good alternative is the multiprocessing module. This may or may not work well, depending on how much data you end up having to pass around from one process to another.

    Another good alternative would be to consider using numpy for your computations (if you aren’t already). If you can vectorize your code, you should be able to achieve significant speedups even on a single core. Depending on what exactly you’re doing and on your build of numpy, it might even be able to transparently distribute the computations across multiple cores.

    edit Here is a complete example of using the multiprocessing module to perform a simple computation. It uses four processes to compute the squares of the numbers from zero to nine.

    from multiprocessing import Pool
    
    def f(x):
        return x*x
    
    if __name__ == '__main__':
        pool = Pool(processes=4)              # start 4 worker processes
        inputs = range(10)
        result = pool.map(f, inputs)
        print result
    

    This is meant as a simple illustration. Given the trivial nature of f(), this parallel version will almost certainly be slower than computing the same thing serially.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a Parallel.ForEach loop running an intensive operation inside the body. The operation
I have loop, where I'll copy all *.txt files to big.txt in the same
Can we have loop unrolling in Microblaze C programming using EDK? This is required
I have loop designed to validate the user input on a question, it was
I have loop for: for (int i = 1; i < 2000; i++) How
I have loop and each iteration of Hash looks like this: [1, {:clid=>1, :nvz=>4,
I'm pretty new to jQuery/JS. But I have loop in jQuery where I would
I have this loop method to display a ViewPager and I set an OnClickListener
I have a loop that enters each non-empty text field into a database: foreach
I have a loop $(.box).find('.video, .print, .web').closest('.box').each(function (index) { $(this).delay(100 * index).fadeIn(300); }); This

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.