Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7739641
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T08:34:24+00:00 2026-06-01T08:34:24+00:00

I have a ‘master’ branch and several topic branches. Assume that the master branch

  • 0

I have a ‘master’ branch and several topic branches. Assume that the master branch is used primarily as a release candidate and no development work happens on this branch.

The topic branches are several and are shared by the team. Some of the branches have more than one developer working on them. All topic branches are rebased from the master branch regularly.

To clean up the history in the ‘master’ branch, I did a ‘git merge –squash’ when merging code from topic to master branches. This worked perfectly fine.

Now – when topic branches are rebased — the commits are getting duplicated. Is there a way to clean up the commits on the topic branches after the ‘git merge –squash’ has been successful?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T08:34:25+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 8:34 am

    Lets assume you have the following scenario:

    A - B - C (master)
     \
      D - E (topic)
    

    If you merge topic into master with –squash you will get something like

    A - B - C - F (master)
     \
      D - E (topic)
    

    Where F contains all changes from D and E. Rebasing topic on master makes no sense since the topic branch is already in master (through F). Instead of rebasing you could move the topic branch to F, e.g.

    git checkout master
    git branch -f topic F
    

    Which yields:

    A - B - C - F (master/topic)
    

    All you need to do now is to push up the moved topic branch:

    git push -f origin topic
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Have a photography site that I want to prevent image copying from. How can
Have a problem that seems easy on paper but i'm having a big problem
Have a query that should hopefully be nice and simple to answer. I have
Have a web service that implements REST (sort of) , Client request is made
Have an app that can use tts to read text messages. It can also
Have a fun issue with sharepoint calendar view filtering. That code works fine: SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate()
Have a Facebook app that is failing as of this morning with the following
have written this little class, which generates a UUID every time an object of
Have a procedure which looks like Procedure TestProc(TVar1, TVar2 : variant); Begin TVar1 :=
Have done quite a bit of searching for a guide (of any substance) for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.