Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3315764
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T22:23:20+00:00 2026-05-17T22:23:20+00:00

I have a Matrix multiply code that does matrix multiply by the following Where

  • 0

I have a Matrix multiply code that does matrix multiply by the following
Where Matrix A * Matrix B = Matrix C

for(j=1;j<=n;j++) {
 for(l=1;l<=k;l++) {
  for(i=1;i<=m;i++) {
   C[i][j] = C[i][j] + B[l][j]*A[i][l];

 }
}

Now I want to turn it into multi threaded matrix multiply and my code is as follows:

I use a struct

struct ij
{
 int rows;
 int columns;
};

my method is

void *MultiplyByThread(void *t)
{
 struct ij *RowsAndColumns = t;
 double total=0; 
 int pos; 
 for(pos = 1;pos<k;pos++)
 {
  fprintf(stdout, "Current Total For: %10.2f",total);
  fprintf(stdout, "%d\n\n",pos);
  total += (A[RowsAndColumns->rows][pos])*(B[pos][RowsAndColumns->columns]);
 }
 D[RowsAndColumns->rows][RowsAndColumns->columns] = total;
 pthread_exit(0);

}

and inside my main is

      for(i=1;i<=m;i++) {
        for(j=1;j<=n;j++) {

   struct ij *t = (struct ij *) malloc(sizeof(struct ij));
   t->rows = i;
   t->columns = j;

    pthread_t thread;
    pthread_attr_t threadAttr;
    pthread_attr_init(&threadAttr);
    pthread_create(&thread, &threadAttr, MultiplyByThread, t);    
    pthread_join(thread, NULL);    

        }
      }

But I can’t seem to get the same result as the first matrix multiply (which is correct)
can someone point me to the right direction?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T22:23:21+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 10:23 pm

    Your threading code is not threaded, in fact. You create a thread and wait for it to complete by calling the join just after calling the create. You have to create a matrix of mxn threads, launch them all, and then join them all. Apart from that, the code seems to be calculating the same as the loop. What is the exact discrepancy with the results?

    Example (note, not compiled):

    pthread_t threads[m][n]; /* Threads that will execute in parallel */
    

    and then in the main:

     for(i=1;i<=m;i++) {
        for(j=1;j<=n;j++) {
    
        struct ij *t = (struct ij *) malloc(sizeof(struct ij));
        t->rows = i;
        t->columns = j;
    
        pthread_attr_t threadAttr;
        pthread_attr_init(&threadAttr);
        pthread_create(thread[i][j], &threadAttr, MultiplyByThread, t);    
        }
      }
    
      /* join all the threads */
      for(i=1;i<=m;i++) {
        for(j=1;j<=n;j++) {
           pthread_join(thread[i][j], NULL);
        }
      }
    

    (more or less, just not calling pthread_join for each thread inside the loop).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have several blocks of the following code that each use there own matrix.
I have a sparsely populated matrix that's the result of a series of left
I have a class to parse a matrix that keeps the result in an
I have a program that uses JAMA and need to test is a matrix
I have a matrix in SQL reporting and I would like it to print
just a quick question, if I have a matrix has n rows and m
I have a 30000x14000 sparse matrix in MATLAB (version 7), which I need to
I have looked at the SQL Server 2008 feature comparison matrix and it lists
Have just started using Google Chrome , and noticed in parts of our site,
Have you ever seen any of there error messages? -- SQL Server 2000 Could

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.